<p>We construct a derived stack <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3259_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {X}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">X</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of Laurent <i>F</i>-crystals on <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="MediaObjects/208_2025_3259_IEq2_HTML.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="120" Type="Linedraw" Width="48" /> </InlineMediaObject> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3259_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="27" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {O}_K\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">O</mi> <mi>K</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the ring of integers of a finite extension <i>K</i> of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3259_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {Q}_p\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">Q</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We first show that its underlying classical stack <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3259_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="26" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^\textrm{cl}\mathcal {X}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mtext>cl</mtext> </mmultiscripts> <mi mathvariant="script">X</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> coincides with the Emerton–Gee stack <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3259_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="31" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {X}_\textrm{EG}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">X</mi> <mtext>EG</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, i.e. the moduli stack of étale <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3259_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((\varphi ,\Gamma )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-modules. Then we prove that the derived stack <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3259_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {X}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">X</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is classical in the sense that when restricted to truncated animated rings, <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3259_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="17" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {X}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">X</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is equivalent to the sheafification of the left Kan extension of <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="208_2025_3259_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="31" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {X}_\textrm{EG}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">X</mi> <mtext>EG</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> along the inclusion from the classical commutative rings to animated rings.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Classicality of derived Emerton–Gee stack

  • Yu Min

摘要

We construct a derived stack \(\mathcal {X}\) X of Laurent F-crystals on , where \(\mathcal {O}_K\) O K is the ring of integers of a finite extension K of \(\mathbb {Q}_p\) Q p . We first show that its underlying classical stack \(^\textrm{cl}\mathcal {X}\) cl X coincides with the Emerton–Gee stack \(\mathcal {X}_\textrm{EG}\) X EG , i.e. the moduli stack of étale \((\varphi ,\Gamma )\) ( φ , Γ ) -modules. Then we prove that the derived stack \(\mathcal {X}\) X is classical in the sense that when restricted to truncated animated rings, \(\mathcal {X}\) X is equivalent to the sheafification of the left Kan extension of \(\mathcal {X}_\textrm{EG}\) X EG along the inclusion from the classical commutative rings to animated rings.