错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On Laplacian eigenvalue equation with constant Neumann boundary data

  • Yong Huang,
  • Qinfeng Li,
  • Qiuqi Li,
  • Ruofei Yao

摘要

Let \(\Omega \) Ω be a bounded Lipschitz domain in \(\mathbb {R}^n\) R n and we study boundary behaviors of solutions to the following Laplacian eigenvalue equation with constant Neumann data: 0.1 \(\begin{aligned} {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\Delta u=cu\quad &{}\text{ in }\, \Omega \\ \frac{\partial u}{\partial \nu }=-1\quad &{}\text{ on }\, \partial \Omega . \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}\) - Δ u = c u in Ω u ν = - 1 on Ω . First, by using properties of Bessel functions and proving new inequalities on elementary symmetric polynomials, we obtain the following inequality for rectangular boxes, balls and equilateral triangles: 0.2 \(\begin{aligned} \lim _{c\rightarrow \mu _2^-}c\int _{\partial \Omega }u_c\, \textrm{d} \sigma \ge \frac{\hbox {n}-1}{\hbox {n}}\frac{\hbox {P}^2(\Omega )}{|\Omega |}, \end{aligned}\) lim c μ 2 - c Ω u c d σ n - 1 n P 2 ( Ω ) | Ω | , with equality achieved only at cubes and balls. In the above, \(u_c\) u c is the solution to (0.1) and \(\mu _2\) μ 2 is the second Neumann Laplacian eigenvalue. Second, let \(\kappa _1\) κ 1 be the best constant for the Poincaré inequality with the vanishing mean condition over \(\partial \Omega \) Ω , and we prove that \(\kappa _1\le \mu _2\) κ 1 μ 2 and that the equality holds if and only if \(\int _{\partial \Omega }u_c\, \textrm{d} \sigma >0\) Ω u c d σ > 0 for any \(c\in (0,\mu _2)\) c ( 0 , μ 2 ) . As a consequence, \(\kappa _1=\mu _2\) κ 1 = μ 2 on balls, rectangular boxes and equilateral triangles, and balls maximize \(\kappa _1\) κ 1 over all Lipschitz domains with fixed volume. As an application, we extend the symmetry breaking results from ball domains obtained in Bucur-Buttazzo-Nitsch (J Math Pures Appl (9) 107(4): 451–463, 2017), to wider class of domains, and give quantitative estimates for the precise breaking threshold at balls and rectangular boxes. It is a direct consequence that for domains with \(\kappa _1<\mu _2\) κ 1 < μ 2 , (0.2) is never true, while whether it is valid for domains on which \(\kappa _1=\mu _2\) κ 1 = μ 2 remains open.