Scholarlink

Introduction and Hypothesis <p>To compare perioperative outcomes and early anatomical results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and vNOTES lateral suspension in women undergoing uterus-preserving surgery for apical pelvic organ prolapse.</p> Methods <p>This prospective study included 100 women with symptomatic apical pelvic organ prolapse who preferred uterine preservation between June 2022 and December 2024. Fifty patients underwent laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and 50 underwent vNOTES lateral suspension. Demographic characteristics, perioperative outcomes, postoperative pain scores, and anatomical results based on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) measurements were evaluated. Surgical success, recurrence, and postoperative complications were also assessed.</p> Results <p>Operative time was longer in the laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy group than in the vNOTES group (102.4 ± 18.6 vs 78.6 ± 15.2&#xa0;min, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Postoperative hemoglobin decrease was greater in the laparoscopic group (1.28 ± 0.64 vs 0.82 ± 0.51&#xa0;g/dL, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Pain scores at 6 and 24&#xa0;h were lower in the vNOTES group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Hospital stay was also shorter in the vNOTES group (1.6 ± 0.6 vs 2.3 ± 0.8&#xa0;days, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Both techniques significantly improved POP-Q measurements, with comparable anatomical outcomes. Apical success rates were 96% and 94%, respectively.</p> Conclusions <p>Both techniques are effective uterus-preserving options for apical pelvic organ prolapse. Although anatomical outcomes were similar, vNOTES lateral suspension showed advantages in operative time, postoperative pain, and hospital stay.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Versus vNOTES Lateral Suspension for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Comparative Study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月7日

查看全文
  • Abdurrahman Sengi,
  • Sertaç Ayçiçek,
  • Mayıs Jinda Pekgül,
  • Mehmet Nuri Duran

摘要

Introduction and Hypothesis

To compare perioperative outcomes and early anatomical results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and vNOTES lateral suspension in women undergoing uterus-preserving surgery for apical pelvic organ prolapse.

Methods

This prospective study included 100 women with symptomatic apical pelvic organ prolapse who preferred uterine preservation between June 2022 and December 2024. Fifty patients underwent laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and 50 underwent vNOTES lateral suspension. Demographic characteristics, perioperative outcomes, postoperative pain scores, and anatomical results based on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) measurements were evaluated. Surgical success, recurrence, and postoperative complications were also assessed.

Results

Operative time was longer in the laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy group than in the vNOTES group (102.4 ± 18.6 vs 78.6 ± 15.2 min, p < 0.001). Postoperative hemoglobin decrease was greater in the laparoscopic group (1.28 ± 0.64 vs 0.82 ± 0.51 g/dL, p = 0.002). Pain scores at 6 and 24 h were lower in the vNOTES group (p < 0.001). Hospital stay was also shorter in the vNOTES group (1.6 ± 0.6 vs 2.3 ± 0.8 days, p < 0.001). Both techniques significantly improved POP-Q measurements, with comparable anatomical outcomes. Apical success rates were 96% and 94%, respectively.

Conclusions

Both techniques are effective uterus-preserving options for apical pelvic organ prolapse. Although anatomical outcomes were similar, vNOTES lateral suspension showed advantages in operative time, postoperative pain, and hospital stay.