Scholarlink

<p>In the context of accelerating industrial informatization and integration, efficient and holistic evaluation of engineering design is crucial for supporting flexible, sustainable, and personalized manufacturing. While design evaluation plays a pivotal role in aligning technical decisions with economic, environmental, and social objectives, existing approaches often remain fragmented, single-metric oriented, and insufficiently adaptive to evolving industrial demands. This study provides a structured review of current evaluation methods from the perspectives of design methodologies and design objectives, highlighting their limitations in addressing life cycle considerations and iterative processes. To overcome these challenges, we propose a conceptual adaptable evaluation framework that integrates multidimensional goals, embeds life cycle thinking, and supports iterative optimization, thereby advancing both the efficiency and comprehensiveness of design evaluation. The proposed framework provides a unified foundation for researchers and practitioners to rethink industrial product design evaluation and outlines a research agenda toward more integrated and practically relevant methodologies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

From fragmented methods to integrated frameworks: a review and proposal for adaptable product design evaluation

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月5日

查看全文
  • Xiaohe Chen,
  • Zhilin Sun,
  • Kaifeng Wang,
  • Lei Wang

摘要

In the context of accelerating industrial informatization and integration, efficient and holistic evaluation of engineering design is crucial for supporting flexible, sustainable, and personalized manufacturing. While design evaluation plays a pivotal role in aligning technical decisions with economic, environmental, and social objectives, existing approaches often remain fragmented, single-metric oriented, and insufficiently adaptive to evolving industrial demands. This study provides a structured review of current evaluation methods from the perspectives of design methodologies and design objectives, highlighting their limitations in addressing life cycle considerations and iterative processes. To overcome these challenges, we propose a conceptual adaptable evaluation framework that integrates multidimensional goals, embeds life cycle thinking, and supports iterative optimization, thereby advancing both the efficiency and comprehensiveness of design evaluation. The proposed framework provides a unified foundation for researchers and practitioners to rethink industrial product design evaluation and outlines a research agenda toward more integrated and practically relevant methodologies.