Scholarlink

<p>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes in both, scientific research and clinical practice. Standardizing the use of validated PROMs is essential to improve data comparability and enhance patient care, particularly in the context of elbow-related conditions.. For elbow-related diseases, over&#xa0;70&#xa0;scoring systems exist but many lack validation, particularly in the German language; however, a&#xa0;standardized and validated documentation is essential to ensure reliable and comparable results in both, clinical work and research. The aim of this study is to evaluate frequently used PROMs for elbow function and to provide recommendations based on their psychometric properties, particularly focusing on available German language adaptations. The selected elbow PROMs were reviewed with respect to psychometric properties, such as reliability, validity and clinical relevance (minimal clinically important difference, MCID). Based on these criteria the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), the Oxford elbow score (OES), the patient rated elbow evaluation (PREE) and the patient rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) were selected. Data from validation studies were included to assess the suitability of the scores for clinical use in German-speaking populations. While the MEPS is the most widely used scoring tool worldwide, both the OES and the PREE exhibit superior psychometric properties. For specific diseases, such as lateral epicondylitis, the use of the PRTEE is particularly recommended.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Empfehlung für Fragebögen zur Untersuchung der Ellenbogenfunktion vom Research-Komitee der AGA

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月20日

查看全文
  • L. Eckl,
  • C. Schoch,
  • D. Günther,
  • J. Ackermann,
  • A. Deichsel,
  • L. Eggeling,
  • B. Laky,
  • D. T. Mathis,
  • G. B. Merkely,
  • L. N. Münch,
  • K. F. Schüttler,
  • C. Kittl,
  • A. Wafaisade

摘要

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes in both, scientific research and clinical practice. Standardizing the use of validated PROMs is essential to improve data comparability and enhance patient care, particularly in the context of elbow-related conditions.. For elbow-related diseases, over 70 scoring systems exist but many lack validation, particularly in the German language; however, a standardized and validated documentation is essential to ensure reliable and comparable results in both, clinical work and research. The aim of this study is to evaluate frequently used PROMs for elbow function and to provide recommendations based on their psychometric properties, particularly focusing on available German language adaptations. The selected elbow PROMs were reviewed with respect to psychometric properties, such as reliability, validity and clinical relevance (minimal clinically important difference, MCID). Based on these criteria the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), the Oxford elbow score (OES), the patient rated elbow evaluation (PREE) and the patient rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) were selected. Data from validation studies were included to assess the suitability of the scores for clinical use in German-speaking populations. While the MEPS is the most widely used scoring tool worldwide, both the OES and the PREE exhibit superior psychometric properties. For specific diseases, such as lateral epicondylitis, the use of the PRTEE is particularly recommended.