Scholarlink

Abstract <p>Acute brain injury (ABI), including traumatic brain injury, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, is associated with high morbidity and mortality, which is driven not only by the primary brain injury, but also by the development of secondary cerebral insults. Among these, raised intracranial pressure (ICP) plays a central pathophysiological role, acting both as a consequence and a driver of ongoing brain injury through mechanical deformation and cerebral ischemia. Although invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has a longstanding and ongoing role in neurocritical care management, the interpretation and clinical use of ICP remain controversial. Traditional management strategies rely on fixed ICP thresholds (e.g., &gt; 22&#xa0;mmHg) to trigger a standardized stepwise escalation of therapy; however, growing clinical evidence indicates that tolerance to ICP elevation varies widely across patients, disease entities, and physiological contexts. This review summarizes the physiological determinants of ICP, including intracranial compliance, cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, cerebral blood volume, and systemic factors, and describes the mechanisms underlying intracranial hypertension. We discuss limitations of using fixed ICP thresholds and highlight emerging concepts, such as ICP burden, waveform morphology, cerebral autoregulation, and functional brain monitoring, as tools to individualize ICP interpretation. The role of invasive and noninvasive ICP monitoring (nICP) modalities is reviewed, emphasizing the complementary value of nICP in guiding decision-making when invasive monitoring is unavailable or contraindicated. Particular attention is given to the integration of ICP within multimodal neuromonitoring frameworks assessing cerebral perfusion, oxygenation, and metabolism. Finally, we explore future perspectives, including the potential of artificial intelligence–based approaches to analyse complex neuromonitoring data, predict secondary insults, and move toward actionable, patientspecific therapeutic strategies. Collectively, these advances support a shift from a uniform, threshold-driven approach toward individualized, physiology-informed management of intracranial hypertension.</p> Visual abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Intracranial pressure physiology, monitoring and individualized management in the acute brain injured patient

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月29日

查看全文
  • Fabio Silvio Taccone,
  • Yaseen Arabi,
  • Marta Baggiani,
  • Sergio Brasil,
  • Anthony Figaji,
  • Elisa Gouvea Bogossian,
  • Gregory Hawryluk,
  • Victoria Mccredie,
  • Kirsten Moller,
  • Corina Puppo,
  • Chiara Robba,
  • Gentle Sunder Shrestha,
  • Fadime Tokmak,
  • Andrew Udy,
  • Yu Lin Wong,
  • Geert Meyfroidt

摘要

Abstract

Acute brain injury (ABI), including traumatic brain injury, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, is associated with high morbidity and mortality, which is driven not only by the primary brain injury, but also by the development of secondary cerebral insults. Among these, raised intracranial pressure (ICP) plays a central pathophysiological role, acting both as a consequence and a driver of ongoing brain injury through mechanical deformation and cerebral ischemia. Although invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has a longstanding and ongoing role in neurocritical care management, the interpretation and clinical use of ICP remain controversial. Traditional management strategies rely on fixed ICP thresholds (e.g., > 22 mmHg) to trigger a standardized stepwise escalation of therapy; however, growing clinical evidence indicates that tolerance to ICP elevation varies widely across patients, disease entities, and physiological contexts. This review summarizes the physiological determinants of ICP, including intracranial compliance, cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, cerebral blood volume, and systemic factors, and describes the mechanisms underlying intracranial hypertension. We discuss limitations of using fixed ICP thresholds and highlight emerging concepts, such as ICP burden, waveform morphology, cerebral autoregulation, and functional brain monitoring, as tools to individualize ICP interpretation. The role of invasive and noninvasive ICP monitoring (nICP) modalities is reviewed, emphasizing the complementary value of nICP in guiding decision-making when invasive monitoring is unavailable or contraindicated. Particular attention is given to the integration of ICP within multimodal neuromonitoring frameworks assessing cerebral perfusion, oxygenation, and metabolism. Finally, we explore future perspectives, including the potential of artificial intelligence–based approaches to analyse complex neuromonitoring data, predict secondary insults, and move toward actionable, patientspecific therapeutic strategies. Collectively, these advances support a shift from a uniform, threshold-driven approach toward individualized, physiology-informed management of intracranial hypertension.

Visual abstract