Scholarlink

Aims/hypothesis <p>Dysglycaemia in youth results from complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors, yet their individual and combined contributions remain unclear. We aimed to: (1) evaluate the predictive performance of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for glycaemic traits from childhood to early adulthood; (2) identify gene–environment interactions shaping glucose homeostasis trajectories; and (3) explore underlying mechanisms using pathway-specific PRSs.</p> Methods <p>Data from 8783 participants (aged 7–24 years) from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) were used to compute 12 PRSs for type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose, insulin and BMI. Glycaemic outcomes, including insulin resistance, prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose) and type 2 diabetes, were assessed using fasting glucose and insulin (ages 7, 15, 18 and 24 years) and HbA<sub>1c</sub> (age 9 years). We evaluated whether PRSs could distinguish between transient (resolved by adulthood) and persistent glycaemic abnormalities using multinomial regression. We performed univariate and multivariate regressions, incorporating environmental factors (lifestyle, diet and maternal characteristics), and evaluated model performance using R<sup>2</sup> and AUC. We tested interactions between PRS quintiles and environmental factors and explored pathophysiological mechanisms using pathway-specific PRSs.</p> Results <p>Prediabetes prevalence was up to 24% at age 24 years. PRS-enhanced models outperformed those using environmental factors alone (e.g. AUC for dysglycaemia at age 15 improved by 0.12, reaching 0.78). Fasting glucose PRS showed moderate ability to differentiate transient from persistent prediabetes (AUC=0.70). Gene–environment analyses revealed that high genetic risk combined with increased screen time or younger maternal age increased insulin resistance risk. Physical activity and health awareness attenuated this risk. Pathway analyses indicated insulin secretion as a key mechanism earlier in life, with insulin resistance emerging later.</p> Conclusions/interpretation <p>Genes interact with environment to define glucose homeostasis in youth, highlighting modifiable factors as actionable targets for early prevention.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Nature vs nurture of glucose homeostasis trajectories in children from the ALSPAC study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月15日

查看全文
  • Isabel Gamache,
  • Kaossarath Fagbemi,
  • Soren Harnois-Leblanc,
  • Celia M. T. Greenwood,
  • Mélanie Henderson,
  • Andrea Van Hulst,
  • Nicholas J. Timpson,
  • Despoina Manousaki

摘要

Aims/hypothesis

Dysglycaemia in youth results from complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors, yet their individual and combined contributions remain unclear. We aimed to: (1) evaluate the predictive performance of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for glycaemic traits from childhood to early adulthood; (2) identify gene–environment interactions shaping glucose homeostasis trajectories; and (3) explore underlying mechanisms using pathway-specific PRSs.

Methods

Data from 8783 participants (aged 7–24 years) from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) were used to compute 12 PRSs for type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose, insulin and BMI. Glycaemic outcomes, including insulin resistance, prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose) and type 2 diabetes, were assessed using fasting glucose and insulin (ages 7, 15, 18 and 24 years) and HbA1c (age 9 years). We evaluated whether PRSs could distinguish between transient (resolved by adulthood) and persistent glycaemic abnormalities using multinomial regression. We performed univariate and multivariate regressions, incorporating environmental factors (lifestyle, diet and maternal characteristics), and evaluated model performance using R2 and AUC. We tested interactions between PRS quintiles and environmental factors and explored pathophysiological mechanisms using pathway-specific PRSs.

Results

Prediabetes prevalence was up to 24% at age 24 years. PRS-enhanced models outperformed those using environmental factors alone (e.g. AUC for dysglycaemia at age 15 improved by 0.12, reaching 0.78). Fasting glucose PRS showed moderate ability to differentiate transient from persistent prediabetes (AUC=0.70). Gene–environment analyses revealed that high genetic risk combined with increased screen time or younger maternal age increased insulin resistance risk. Physical activity and health awareness attenuated this risk. Pathway analyses indicated insulin secretion as a key mechanism earlier in life, with insulin resistance emerging later.

Conclusions/interpretation

Genes interact with environment to define glucose homeostasis in youth, highlighting modifiable factors as actionable targets for early prevention.

Graphical Abstract