Aims/hypothesis <p>People with type 1 diabetes are recommended to modify insulin dosing and/or carbohydrate intake before, during and after exercise to manage blood glucose levels and prevent hypoglycaemia. An exercise strategy that produces a more consistent glycaemic response may facilitate glycaemic management around exercise, thereby reducing barriers to exercise related to blood glucose concentration, such as fear of hypoglycaemia, for people with type 1 diabetes. The aim of this study was to compare the consistency of the glycaemic response to resistance exercise performed in the morning while fasted vs in the afternoon after eating.</p> Methods <p>Twelve adults with type 1 diabetes, HbA<sub>1c</sub> &lt;85 mmol/mol (10.0%), aged 18–55 years and without contraindications to resistance exercise completed six identical resistance exercise sessions, three in the morning while fasted (AM-FAST) and three in the afternoon in a fed state (PM-FED). The six sessions were completed in a random order in an unblinded, crossover trial, supervised at the Physical Activity and Diabetes Laboratory at the University of Alberta. We compared the within-participant standard deviation (wpSD) of the capillary blood glucose response to AM-FAST vs PM-FED sessions. Capillary glucose was measured pre-exercise, immediately post exercise and 30 min after exercise. Continuous glucose monitoring data were analysed from immediately post exercise up to 24 h after exercise.</p> Results <p>The wpSD of the change in capillary glucose during exercise was lower for AM-FAST (1.0±1.1 mmol/l) than PM-FED (1.5±1.0 mmol/l; <i>p</i>=0.029). There was no difference in the wpSD between conditions during the subsequent 30 min seated recovery (<i>p</i>=0.76). During exercise capillary glucose increased by 1.4±1.9 mmol/l for AM-FAST and decreased by 0.9±2.3 mmol/l for PM-FED (<i>p</i>=0.017). There was a greater percentage of time in hyperglycaemia in the 6 h post-exercise period following AM-FAST vs PM-FED (56.7% [27.2, 67.9] vs 33.0% [22.6, 41.5]; <i>p</i>=0.003, respectively).</p> Conclusions/interpretation <p>The glycaemic response to AM-FAST was more consistent and characterised by increases in glucose concentration, whereas the glycaemic response to PM-FED was less consistent and produced decreases in glucose concentration. Performing resistance exercise while fasted may reduce barriers to exercise for people with type 1 diabetes due to a more consistent glycaemic response that is less likely to cause hypoglycaemia during exercise.</p> Trial registration <p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05168488.</p> Funding <p>Dexcom Canada provided in-kind funding in the form of Dexcom G6 transmitters, sensors and receivers. LifeScan Canada provided in-kind funding in capillary glucose testing strips. JEY was supported by a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Alberta New Investigator Award.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The glycaemic response to morning fasted resistance exercise is more consistent than the response to afternoon fed resistance exercise for adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover comparison

  • Reid D. McClure,
  • Alice L. J. Carr,
  • Normand G. Boulé,
  • Jane E. Yardley

摘要

Aims/hypothesis

People with type 1 diabetes are recommended to modify insulin dosing and/or carbohydrate intake before, during and after exercise to manage blood glucose levels and prevent hypoglycaemia. An exercise strategy that produces a more consistent glycaemic response may facilitate glycaemic management around exercise, thereby reducing barriers to exercise related to blood glucose concentration, such as fear of hypoglycaemia, for people with type 1 diabetes. The aim of this study was to compare the consistency of the glycaemic response to resistance exercise performed in the morning while fasted vs in the afternoon after eating.

Methods

Twelve adults with type 1 diabetes, HbA1c <85 mmol/mol (10.0%), aged 18–55 years and without contraindications to resistance exercise completed six identical resistance exercise sessions, three in the morning while fasted (AM-FAST) and three in the afternoon in a fed state (PM-FED). The six sessions were completed in a random order in an unblinded, crossover trial, supervised at the Physical Activity and Diabetes Laboratory at the University of Alberta. We compared the within-participant standard deviation (wpSD) of the capillary blood glucose response to AM-FAST vs PM-FED sessions. Capillary glucose was measured pre-exercise, immediately post exercise and 30 min after exercise. Continuous glucose monitoring data were analysed from immediately post exercise up to 24 h after exercise.

Results

The wpSD of the change in capillary glucose during exercise was lower for AM-FAST (1.0±1.1 mmol/l) than PM-FED (1.5±1.0 mmol/l; p=0.029). There was no difference in the wpSD between conditions during the subsequent 30 min seated recovery (p=0.76). During exercise capillary glucose increased by 1.4±1.9 mmol/l for AM-FAST and decreased by 0.9±2.3 mmol/l for PM-FED (p=0.017). There was a greater percentage of time in hyperglycaemia in the 6 h post-exercise period following AM-FAST vs PM-FED (56.7% [27.2, 67.9] vs 33.0% [22.6, 41.5]; p=0.003, respectively).

Conclusions/interpretation

The glycaemic response to AM-FAST was more consistent and characterised by increases in glucose concentration, whereas the glycaemic response to PM-FED was less consistent and produced decreases in glucose concentration. Performing resistance exercise while fasted may reduce barriers to exercise for people with type 1 diabetes due to a more consistent glycaemic response that is less likely to cause hypoglycaemia during exercise.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05168488.

Funding

Dexcom Canada provided in-kind funding in the form of Dexcom G6 transmitters, sensors and receivers. LifeScan Canada provided in-kind funding in capillary glucose testing strips. JEY was supported by a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Alberta New Investigator Award.

Graphical Abstract