Scholarlink

Background <p>Penile prosthesis surgery represents an established, guideline-based treatment option for therapy-refractory organic erectile dysfunction. Despite continuous technical advances, low complication rates and high patient satisfaction, implantation rates in Germany have remained consistently low for many years.</p> Objective <p>To summarise the historical and technical development of penile prosthesis surgery and to analyse current utilisation data with particular emphasis on potential structural causes of underuse.</p> Results <p>Modern semi-rigid and inflatable penile prostheses demonstrate high material quality, long-term durability and low infection rates. Long-term studies report functional survival rates of approximately 80% at 10&#xa0;years, together with excellent satisfaction levels among patients and their partners. In contrast, national and international registry data indicate that only a&#xa0;small proportion of eligible patients—particularly those following radical prostatectomy or with diabetes-associated or vasculogenic erectile dysfunction—receive a&#xa0;penile prosthesis. These findings suggest a&#xa0;substantial gap between evidence-based recommendations and real-world clinical practice.</p> Conclusion <p>Persistently low implantation rates cannot be explained by insufficient scientific evidence or limited patient acceptance. They are more likely attributable to structural factors such as low institutional case volumes, restricted resource allocation and a&#xa0;lack of centralised care. Given the well-documented volume–outcome relationship, increasing life expectancy and the growing importance of quality of life, greater structuring and centralisation of penile prosthesis surgery would appear beneficial.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Schwellkörperprothetik in Deutschland – seit über 50 Jahren bewährt und noch immer unterschätzt

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月25日

查看全文
  • Daniel Schlager,
  • Christian Leiber-Caspers

摘要

Background

Penile prosthesis surgery represents an established, guideline-based treatment option for therapy-refractory organic erectile dysfunction. Despite continuous technical advances, low complication rates and high patient satisfaction, implantation rates in Germany have remained consistently low for many years.

Objective

To summarise the historical and technical development of penile prosthesis surgery and to analyse current utilisation data with particular emphasis on potential structural causes of underuse.

Results

Modern semi-rigid and inflatable penile prostheses demonstrate high material quality, long-term durability and low infection rates. Long-term studies report functional survival rates of approximately 80% at 10 years, together with excellent satisfaction levels among patients and their partners. In contrast, national and international registry data indicate that only a small proportion of eligible patients—particularly those following radical prostatectomy or with diabetes-associated or vasculogenic erectile dysfunction—receive a penile prosthesis. These findings suggest a substantial gap between evidence-based recommendations and real-world clinical practice.

Conclusion

Persistently low implantation rates cannot be explained by insufficient scientific evidence or limited patient acceptance. They are more likely attributable to structural factors such as low institutional case volumes, restricted resource allocation and a lack of centralised care. Given the well-documented volume–outcome relationship, increasing life expectancy and the growing importance of quality of life, greater structuring and centralisation of penile prosthesis surgery would appear beneficial.