Scholarlink

Background <p>Chest tube dislodgement is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication after thoracic trauma. Reliable fixation is essential, particularly in emergency and combat casualty care. Several suture techniques exist, but comparative biomechanical evidence is limited.</p> Methods <p>This prospective biomechanical cadaveric study compared three fixation techniques—Purse String (PS), Roman Sandal (RS), and Modified Johannesburg (JO) technique —across three tube sizes (20, 24, 28 Charrière) and two materials (polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and silicone). A total of 360 tests were performed on porcine thoracic wall specimens under standardized conditions. Specimens were subjected to vertical load-to-failure testing with continuous measurement of force and elongation.</p> Results <p>The Modified Johannesburg technique consistently demonstrated the highest pull-out strength across all tube sizes and materials, significantly outperforming both RS and PS (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). RS ranked second and showed significantly greater stability than PS in all conditions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Effect size analysis revealed large differences between JO and PS (<i>r</i> = 0.87) and between RS and PS (<i>r</i> = 0.50), and a medium effect between JO and RS (<i>r</i> = 0.36). PVC tubes provided significantly greater pull-out strength than silicone tubes (147.0 ± 54.2&#xa0;N vs. 128.5 ± 42.2&#xa0;N; <i>p</i> = 0.01071), although silicone tubes exhibited greater elongation prior to failure. Tube size had a modest influence on stability, with larger tubes tending toward higher pull-out strength, but pairwise differences did not reach significance. The predominant failure mechanism was suture rupture (78.9%), followed by tube rupture (11.1%), knot loosening (8.1%), and skin failure (1.9%).</p> Conclusions <p>The Modified Johannesburg Technique offers superior biomechanical stability for chest tube fixation, regardless of tube size or material. This technique should be considered the preferred method in high-risk environments, including military and emergency care, to minimize dislodgement and enhance patient safety.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Modified Johannesburg technique sets the standard – superior biomechanical stability in chest tube fixation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月22日

查看全文
  • Johann Justus Fricke,
  • Tobias Schöbel,
  • Ric Meißner,
  • Stefan Schleifenbaum,
  • Christian Kleber,
  • Isabella Metelmann,
  • Sebastian Krämer

摘要

Background

Chest tube dislodgement is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication after thoracic trauma. Reliable fixation is essential, particularly in emergency and combat casualty care. Several suture techniques exist, but comparative biomechanical evidence is limited.

Methods

This prospective biomechanical cadaveric study compared three fixation techniques—Purse String (PS), Roman Sandal (RS), and Modified Johannesburg (JO) technique —across three tube sizes (20, 24, 28 Charrière) and two materials (polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and silicone). A total of 360 tests were performed on porcine thoracic wall specimens under standardized conditions. Specimens were subjected to vertical load-to-failure testing with continuous measurement of force and elongation.

Results

The Modified Johannesburg technique consistently demonstrated the highest pull-out strength across all tube sizes and materials, significantly outperforming both RS and PS (p < 0.0001). RS ranked second and showed significantly greater stability than PS in all conditions (p < 0.0001). Effect size analysis revealed large differences between JO and PS (r = 0.87) and between RS and PS (r = 0.50), and a medium effect between JO and RS (r = 0.36). PVC tubes provided significantly greater pull-out strength than silicone tubes (147.0 ± 54.2 N vs. 128.5 ± 42.2 N; p = 0.01071), although silicone tubes exhibited greater elongation prior to failure. Tube size had a modest influence on stability, with larger tubes tending toward higher pull-out strength, but pairwise differences did not reach significance. The predominant failure mechanism was suture rupture (78.9%), followed by tube rupture (11.1%), knot loosening (8.1%), and skin failure (1.9%).

Conclusions

The Modified Johannesburg Technique offers superior biomechanical stability for chest tube fixation, regardless of tube size or material. This technique should be considered the preferred method in high-risk environments, including military and emergency care, to minimize dislodgement and enhance patient safety.