Purpose <p>The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of FAST ankle ultrasound, performed by non-radiologist specialist physicians, compared to standard X-ray imaging for ankle and foot trauma in the emergency department. Additionally, we analyzed whether other variables, such as demographic characteristics of the included patients, could influence fracture detection with the diagnostic tools used.</p> Methods <p>A non-randomized monocentric prospective diagnostic cohort study was conducted on 143 patients.</p> Results <p>Ankle and foot fractures were more frequently detected by FAST ultrasound compared to standard radiography. Regarding the influence of demographic factors, age and the correlation between Body Mass Index and age significantly influenced the ability to detect fractures.</p> Conclusion <p>FAST ultrasound demonstrated good diagnostic value in routine clinical practice for screening purposes and could be easily applied by non-radiologist specialist physicians. Implementing this approach may reduce time and costs in patient management, thereby aiding in alleviating triage congestion in the emergency department.</p> Trial registration number and date of registration for prospectively registered trials <p>NCT05528432; 21-02-21.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Diagnostic value of FAST ankle ultrasound compared to standard radiography for fracture detection in the emergency department by non-radiologist physicians: a monocentric prospective diagnostic cohort study

  • Laeticia Vaiana Frezals,
  • Arnaud Delafontaine,
  • Hélène Scoubeau,
  • Régis Sontou,
  • Sofie Moorthamers,
  • Antoine Plumacker,
  • Alain Plumacker

摘要

Purpose

The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of FAST ankle ultrasound, performed by non-radiologist specialist physicians, compared to standard X-ray imaging for ankle and foot trauma in the emergency department. Additionally, we analyzed whether other variables, such as demographic characteristics of the included patients, could influence fracture detection with the diagnostic tools used.

Methods

A non-randomized monocentric prospective diagnostic cohort study was conducted on 143 patients.

Results

Ankle and foot fractures were more frequently detected by FAST ultrasound compared to standard radiography. Regarding the influence of demographic factors, age and the correlation between Body Mass Index and age significantly influenced the ability to detect fractures.

Conclusion

FAST ultrasound demonstrated good diagnostic value in routine clinical practice for screening purposes and could be easily applied by non-radiologist specialist physicians. Implementing this approach may reduce time and costs in patient management, thereby aiding in alleviating triage congestion in the emergency department.

Trial registration number and date of registration for prospectively registered trials

NCT05528432; 21-02-21.