Purpose <p>Evidence to guide the application of damage control laparotomy (DCL) in emergency surgery patients is limited. We assessed whether DCL use for emergent small bowel or colon surgery increased over time and its impact on outcomes. We hypothesized that DCL would be utilized more often in patients with significant comorbidities or septic shock with improved outcomes.</p> Methods <p>National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data on DCL patients from 2014 to 2020 were used. Endpoints were incidence of DCL, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), complications, and 30-day readmission over time. P-values &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p> Results <p>DCL incidence increased over time (OR = 1.07 [1.05–1.08], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Presence of pre-operative septic shock increased over the years (OR = 1.04 [1.01–1.07], <i>p</i> = 0.007). Mortality, readmission, and post-operative septic complications did not change over the study period. Average LOS significantly decreased over time (OR = 0.93 [0.92–0.95], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusion <p>The odds of a surgeon using DCL increased by 7% each year. Although pre-operative septic shock incidence increased, LOS decreased over time while mortality remained unchanged.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Increased use of damage control laparotomy for emergency small bowel or colon surgery: does it affect patient outcomes?

  • Connor P. Littlefield,
  • Maosong Ye,
  • Linder Wendt,
  • Colette Galet,
  • Kevin Huang,
  • Dionne A. Skeete

摘要

Purpose

Evidence to guide the application of damage control laparotomy (DCL) in emergency surgery patients is limited. We assessed whether DCL use for emergent small bowel or colon surgery increased over time and its impact on outcomes. We hypothesized that DCL would be utilized more often in patients with significant comorbidities or septic shock with improved outcomes.

Methods

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data on DCL patients from 2014 to 2020 were used. Endpoints were incidence of DCL, in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), complications, and 30-day readmission over time. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

DCL incidence increased over time (OR = 1.07 [1.05–1.08], p < 0.001). Presence of pre-operative septic shock increased over the years (OR = 1.04 [1.01–1.07], p = 0.007). Mortality, readmission, and post-operative septic complications did not change over the study period. Average LOS significantly decreased over time (OR = 0.93 [0.92–0.95], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The odds of a surgeon using DCL increased by 7% each year. Although pre-operative septic shock incidence increased, LOS decreased over time while mortality remained unchanged.