Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The healthcare sector is a&#xa0;large greenhouse gas producer. Especially in radiotherapy (RT), a&#xa0;lot of electricity is consumed by the medical linear accelerator (linac) and associated patient travel. Our aim was to ascertain by how much electrical energy consumption and patient travel can be reduced by replacing normofractionated (NF) with emerging moderately hypofractionated (UF) or ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) concepts.</p> Methods <p>We connected an energy meter to our linac (VersaHD, Elekta©, Stockholm, Sweden) and evaluated different fractionation concepts (NF, HF, UHF) for 30&#xa0;patients with target volumes of the prostate, breast, and spine. In addition to the energy measurements, we also conducted an analysis of the carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions associated with the variations in patient travel.</p> Results <p>This study measured the energy consumption of a&#xa0;linac (in kWh) and its impact on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for various radiotherapy fractionation concepts. Ultra-hypofractionated regimens consistently showed the lowest energy consumption and variability across prostate, breast, and bone metastasis treatment courses, while NF regimens had significantly higher energy consumption and variability. Transitioning from NF to UHF regimens reduced CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by up to 75%, driven by fewer patient visits and lower electricity consumption. These findings highlight the environmental and logistical benefits of HF and UHF treatment protocols.</p> Conclusion <p>The adoption of HF and UHF treatment concepts can significantly reduce energy consumption and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, achieving an up to 75% reduction per treatment course. This is primarily due to decreased patient travel and electricity consumption at the linac. Extrapolated globally, these changes offer further potential to mitigate climate change.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Optimizing energy consumption in radiotherapy: standard vs. hypo-/ultra-hypofractionation and becoming SMART (specific, measurable, achievable in radiotherapy)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月17日

查看全文
  • Ann-Katrin Exeli,
  • Andreas Lurtz,
  • Linda Agolli,
  • Daniel Habermehl

摘要

Purpose

The healthcare sector is a large greenhouse gas producer. Especially in radiotherapy (RT), a lot of electricity is consumed by the medical linear accelerator (linac) and associated patient travel. Our aim was to ascertain by how much electrical energy consumption and patient travel can be reduced by replacing normofractionated (NF) with emerging moderately hypofractionated (UF) or ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) concepts.

Methods

We connected an energy meter to our linac (VersaHD, Elekta©, Stockholm, Sweden) and evaluated different fractionation concepts (NF, HF, UHF) for 30 patients with target volumes of the prostate, breast, and spine. In addition to the energy measurements, we also conducted an analysis of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions associated with the variations in patient travel.

Results

This study measured the energy consumption of a linac (in kWh) and its impact on CO2 emissions for various radiotherapy fractionation concepts. Ultra-hypofractionated regimens consistently showed the lowest energy consumption and variability across prostate, breast, and bone metastasis treatment courses, while NF regimens had significantly higher energy consumption and variability. Transitioning from NF to UHF regimens reduced CO2 emissions by up to 75%, driven by fewer patient visits and lower electricity consumption. These findings highlight the environmental and logistical benefits of HF and UHF treatment protocols.

Conclusion

The adoption of HF and UHF treatment concepts can significantly reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions, achieving an up to 75% reduction per treatment course. This is primarily due to decreased patient travel and electricity consumption at the linac. Extrapolated globally, these changes offer further potential to mitigate climate change.