错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Analysis of operative duration of image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer

  • Yoshiaki Takagawa,
  • Masanori Machida,
  • Ichiro Seto,
  • Shinya Komori,
  • Hiroki Sato,
  • Hiromitsu Endo,
  • Hiroko Midorikawa,
  • Takahiro Kato,
  • Masao Murakami,
  • Michitaka Honda,
  • Koji Kono

摘要

Purpose

The present study aimed to analyze the operative duration of image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) for cervical cancer performed at our institution.

Methods

We enrolled cervical cancer patients who had undergone tandem and ovoid-based intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) or intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) between 2020 and 2024. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), CT, or CT + MRI were used for IGBT. For each IGBT session, we retrospectively reviewed the following: application time (AT—defined as the duration from entry into the operating room to the initial image acquisition); planning time (PT—defined as the duration from the initial image acquisition to the start of irradiation); and total operation time (TOT— defined as the duration from entry to exit of the operating room).

Results

We analyzed a total of 126 sessions in 36 patients, consisting of 99 ICBT-only sessions and 27 IC/ISBT sessions. The IC/ISBT sessions had a significantly longer mean operative duration than the ICBT-only sessions. The IC/ISBT sessions with three or more interstitial needles had significantly longer AT and TOT. However, the IC/ISBT sessions with one needle showed no significant difference in operative duration compared to ICBT-only sessions. CBCT, CT, and CT + MRI were used in 42, 76, and 8 sessions, respectively. In the ICBT patients, CT + MRI had the longest PT. However, there was no significant differences in TOT among CBCT, CT, and CT + MRI.

Conclusions

IC/ISBT sessions with one needle had no significant difference in operative duration compared to ICBT-only sessions. There was no significant difference in TOT between CT + MRI-based IGBT and CT-based IGBT.