Scholarlink

Objectives <p>To establish cephalometric norms for African American adults with normal occlusion and balanced soft tissue profiles in the Greater Philadelphia region and compare these findings with existing African American norms.</p> Materials and methods <p>A&#xa0;total of 650 orthodontic records from adult African American subjects were reviewed. Normal occlusion was defined based on Angle’s class&#xa0;I molar relationship, an overbite of 20–30% or greater than 0 mm and less than 3 mm, an overjet ranging from 1–3 mm, absence of crossbites, minor dental crowding, and gaps or rotations not exceeding 2 mm, along with a&#xa0;balanced facial profile. According to these criteria, 34&#xa0;lateral cephalograms (25&#xa0;females, 9&#xa0;males; mean age 28.4 ± 12.7 years) were selected. These lateral cephalograms were digitally traced using Dolphin Imaging software (version 12.0, Chatsworth, CA, USA), and the obtained cephalometric measurements were compared with established African American norms from existing literature.</p> Results <p>Skeletally, African American subjects from the Greater Philadelphia region demonstrated smaller vertical measurements, characterized by reduced SN-GoGn, FMA, and Y‑axis angles compared to previously published norms for the African American population. The skeletal sagittal relationship indicated a&#xa0;more anteriorly positioned maxilla relative to established Caucasian norms. Dental evaluations revealed a&#xa0;slight increase in upper incisor inclination and a&#xa0;reduced interincisal angle, as evidenced by measurements such as the 1/to SN, 1/to FH, and 1/to NA angles when compared to existing African American norms. Additionally, subjects from the Greater Philadelphia region exhibited a&#xa0;more protrusive lower lip compared to previously reported norms for African Americans.</p> Conclusion <p>Our findings indicate that cephalometric norms vary by both ethnicity and geographic region, underscoring the necessity of establishing population-specific standards to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Cephalometric norms for African Americans with normal occlusion in the Greater Philadelphia region

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月15日

查看全文
  • Lucy Eun Hwan Kim,
  • Julia Jeong,
  • Frank C. Setzer,
  • Chun-Hsi Chung,
  • Hyeran Helen Jeon

摘要

Objectives

To establish cephalometric norms for African American adults with normal occlusion and balanced soft tissue profiles in the Greater Philadelphia region and compare these findings with existing African American norms.

Materials and methods

A total of 650 orthodontic records from adult African American subjects were reviewed. Normal occlusion was defined based on Angle’s class I molar relationship, an overbite of 20–30% or greater than 0 mm and less than 3 mm, an overjet ranging from 1–3 mm, absence of crossbites, minor dental crowding, and gaps or rotations not exceeding 2 mm, along with a balanced facial profile. According to these criteria, 34 lateral cephalograms (25 females, 9 males; mean age 28.4 ± 12.7 years) were selected. These lateral cephalograms were digitally traced using Dolphin Imaging software (version 12.0, Chatsworth, CA, USA), and the obtained cephalometric measurements were compared with established African American norms from existing literature.

Results

Skeletally, African American subjects from the Greater Philadelphia region demonstrated smaller vertical measurements, characterized by reduced SN-GoGn, FMA, and Y‑axis angles compared to previously published norms for the African American population. The skeletal sagittal relationship indicated a more anteriorly positioned maxilla relative to established Caucasian norms. Dental evaluations revealed a slight increase in upper incisor inclination and a reduced interincisal angle, as evidenced by measurements such as the 1/to SN, 1/to FH, and 1/to NA angles when compared to existing African American norms. Additionally, subjects from the Greater Philadelphia region exhibited a more protrusive lower lip compared to previously reported norms for African Americans.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that cephalometric norms vary by both ethnicity and geographic region, underscoring the necessity of establishing population-specific standards to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning.