<p>We study the Fourier transform <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {F}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">F</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {R}^n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as a bounded but non-compact operator and quantify its degree of non-compactness via strict singularity and finite strict singularity (Bernstein numbers). For <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1&lt;p&lt;2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> we prove a dichotomy for <Equation ID="Equ15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \mathcal {F}:L^p(\mathbb {R}^n)\rightarrow L^{p',r}(\mathbb {R}^n), \qquad \tfrac{1}{p}+\tfrac{1}{p'}=1, \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">F</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mrow> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> <mo>,</mo> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="2em" /> <mstyle displaystyle="false" scriptlevel="0"> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mi>p</mi> </mfrac> </mstyle> <mo>+</mo> <mstyle displaystyle="false" scriptlevel="0"> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> </mfrac> </mstyle> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>namely: non-compact and not strictly singular at <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(r=p\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (so <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(L^{p',p}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mrow> <msup> <mi>p</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> <mo>,</mo> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is optimal), and finitely strictly singular for <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(r&gt;p\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. For <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2&lt;p\le \infty \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mi>∞</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> we show that <Equation ID="Equ16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( \mathcal {F}:L^p(\mathbb {R}^n)\rightarrow B_p^{\,s}(\mathbb {R}^n) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">F</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <msubsup> <mi>B</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mrow> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>is not strictly singular at <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(s= d_p^n{:}{=}2n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{2})&lt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msubsup> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msubsup> <mo>:</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mi>p</mi> </mfrac> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and is finitely strictly singular for <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(s&lt;d_p^n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <msubsup> <mi>d</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>; the dual results for <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {F}:B_p^{\,s}\rightarrow L^p\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">F</mi> <mo>:</mo> <msubsup> <mi>B</mi> <mi>p</mi> <mrow> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (<InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1&lt;p&lt;2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) is also studied.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Notes on Non-Compactness of Fourier Transforms on \(L^p\) Spaces

  • Jan Lang,
  • David E. Edmunds

摘要

We study the Fourier transform \(\mathcal {F}\) F on \(\mathbb {R}^n\) R n as a bounded but non-compact operator and quantify its degree of non-compactness via strict singularity and finite strict singularity (Bernstein numbers). For \(1<p<2\) 1 < p < 2 we prove a dichotomy for \( \mathcal {F}:L^p(\mathbb {R}^n)\rightarrow L^{p',r}(\mathbb {R}^n), \qquad \tfrac{1}{p}+\tfrac{1}{p'}=1, \) F : L p ( R n ) L p , r ( R n ) , 1 p + 1 p = 1 , namely: non-compact and not strictly singular at \(r=p\) r = p (so \(L^{p',p}\) L p , p is optimal), and finitely strictly singular for \(r>p\) r > p . For \(2<p\le \infty \) 2 < p we show that \( \mathcal {F}:L^p(\mathbb {R}^n)\rightarrow B_p^{\,s}(\mathbb {R}^n) \) F : L p ( R n ) B p s ( R n ) is not strictly singular at \(s= d_p^n{:}{=}2n(\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{2})<0\) s = d p n : = 2 n ( 1 p - 1 2 ) < 0 , and is finitely strictly singular for \(s<d_p^n\) s < d p n ; the dual results for \(\mathcal {F}:B_p^{\,s}\rightarrow L^p\) F : B p s L p ( \(1<p<2\) 1 < p < 2 ) is also studied.