<p>Motivated by problems in control theory concerning decay rates for the damped wave equation <Equation ID="Equ15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} w_{tt}(x,t) + \gamma (x) w_t(x,t) + (-\Delta + 1)^{s/2} w(x,t) = 0, \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">tt</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>+</mo> <mi>γ</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mi>t</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mi>w</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>we consider an analogue of the classical Paneah-Logvinenko-Sereda theorem for the Fourier Bessel transform. In particular, if <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E \subset \mathbb {R}^+\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>⊂</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mo>+</mo> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu _\alpha \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>α</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-relatively dense (where <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(d\mu _\alpha (x) \approx x^{2\alpha +1}\, dx\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <msub> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>α</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≈</mo> <msup> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>α</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>d</mi> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) for <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha &gt; -1/2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {supp} \mathcal {F}_\alpha (f) \subset [R,R+1]\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>supp</mo> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">F</mi> <mi>α</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>⊂</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>R</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>R</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, then we show <Equation ID="Equ16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} \Vert f\Vert _{L^2_\alpha (\mathbb {R}^+)} \lesssim \Vert f\Vert _{L^2_\alpha (E)}, \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>L</mi> <mi>α</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mo>+</mo> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msub> <mo>≲</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">‖</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>L</mi> <mi>α</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>E</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>for all <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(f\in L^2_\alpha (\mathbb {R}^+)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msubsup> <mi>L</mi> <mi>α</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mo>+</mo> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where the constants in <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\lesssim \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>≲</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> do not depend on <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(R &gt; 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Previous results on PLS theorems for the Fourier-Bessel transform by Ghobber and Jaming (2012) provide bounds that depend on <i>R</i>. In contrast, our techniques yield bounds that are independent of <i>R</i>, offering a new perspective on such results. This result is applied to derive decay rates of radial solutions of the damped wave equation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A High-Frequency Uncertainty Principle for the Fourier-Bessel Transform

  • Benjamin Jaye,
  • Rahul Sethi

摘要

Motivated by problems in control theory concerning decay rates for the damped wave equation \(\begin{aligned} w_{tt}(x,t) + \gamma (x) w_t(x,t) + (-\Delta + 1)^{s/2} w(x,t) = 0, \end{aligned}\) w tt ( x , t ) + γ ( x ) w t ( x , t ) + ( - Δ + 1 ) s / 2 w ( x , t ) = 0 , we consider an analogue of the classical Paneah-Logvinenko-Sereda theorem for the Fourier Bessel transform. In particular, if \(E \subset \mathbb {R}^+\) E R + is \(\mu _\alpha \) μ α -relatively dense (where \(d\mu _\alpha (x) \approx x^{2\alpha +1}\, dx\) d μ α ( x ) x 2 α + 1 d x ) for \(\alpha > -1/2\) α > - 1 / 2 , and \(\operatorname {supp} \mathcal {F}_\alpha (f) \subset [R,R+1]\) supp F α ( f ) [ R , R + 1 ] , then we show \(\begin{aligned} \Vert f\Vert _{L^2_\alpha (\mathbb {R}^+)} \lesssim \Vert f\Vert _{L^2_\alpha (E)}, \end{aligned}\) f L α 2 ( R + ) f L α 2 ( E ) , for all \(f\in L^2_\alpha (\mathbb {R}^+)\) f L α 2 ( R + ) , where the constants in \(\lesssim \) do not depend on \(R > 0\) R > 0 . Previous results on PLS theorems for the Fourier-Bessel transform by Ghobber and Jaming (2012) provide bounds that depend on R. In contrast, our techniques yield bounds that are independent of R, offering a new perspective on such results. This result is applied to derive decay rates of radial solutions of the damped wave equation.