<p><i>Melophorus anderseni</i> is a thermophilic ant species that nests near colonies of <i>Iridomyrmex</i> on which it conducts brood raids. We examined its colony founding behavior and foraging ecology to evaluate possible mechanisms that may facilitate interspecific nest raiding, as well as determine if it is a parasite or specialist predator. Specifically, we (1) examined colony establishment and survival, (2) patterns of worker activity (walking speed, foraging and raiding behavior), and (3) compared cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of <i>M. anderseni</i> and <i>I. reburrus</i> workers. Following nuptial flights, <i>M. anderseni</i> queens established colonies in clusters around <i>I. reburrus</i> colonies, with an average distance to the nearest <i>Iridomyrmex</i> nest of 133.1(± 8.9) cm (range 25 to 650&#xa0;cm). The average number of <i>M. anderseni</i> queens per <i>Iridomyrmex</i> nest entrance was 8.4 (± 1.9), and the average distance to the nearest <i>M. anderseni</i> neighbor was 44.9 (± 5.3) cm (range 10 to 233&#xa0;cm). Queen survival was lower in clusters that were farther from the nearest <i>I. reburrus</i> nest or to other <i>M. anderseni</i> queens. <i>Iridomyrmex reburrus</i> activity was negatively related to soil temperature, with no activity occurring above 50&#xa0;°C. In contrast, <i>M. anderseni</i> activity was positively related to temperature with peak activity occurring just above 50&#xa0;°C. <i>Melophorus anderseni</i> worker activity commenced when soil temperatures exceeded 37.4&#xa0;°C, and activity increased until mid-day. Activity ceased in the afternoon at temperatures lower than that for activity commencement, on average at 36.7&#xa0;°C. Activity of <i>M. anderseni</i> at <i>I. reburrus</i> nests followed that of activity at <i>M. anderseni</i> nests. Workers of <i>M. anderseni</i> had an average foraging duration of 63&#xa0;s and a mean foraging distance of 249&#xa0;cm. Of the 49 foragers followed, 42 (86%) entered an <i>I. reburrus</i> nest, and 32 (76.2%) of those entered the closest nest entrance. Of the 1,444 observations of <i>M. anderseni</i> exiting an <i>I. reburrus</i> nest, they stole an item in 122 (8.4%) instances, with 117 (95.9%) of these items being brood. Additionally, workers of <i>M. anderseni</i> had faster running speeds (mean 9.72&#xa0;cm/s, peak 18&#xa0;cm/s) than <i>I. reburrus</i> workers (7.05&#xa0;cm/s). On average, the speed of <i>M. anderseni</i> exiting an <i>I. reburrus</i> nest was more than twice the speed of <i>I. reburrus.</i> Extracts of <i>I. reburrus</i> and <i>M. anderseni</i> worker cuticular hydrocarbon profiles were qualitatively identical in that no compounds were unique to either species. Saturated hydrocarbons with chain lengths between 25 and 29 carbons comprised the majority of hydrocarbons found on the cuticle of both species. The relative abundances of compounds within the profiles of both species were also similar. In contrast, two sympatric <i>Iridomyrmex</i> and <i>Melophorus</i> species shared very few compounds with <i>I. reburrus</i> and <i>M. anderseni</i>. During all observations of the <i>M. anderseni</i> nests, no <i>I. sanguineus</i> workers were observed within or exiting the nest entrance, indicating that stolen brood had been consumed. Our results support that <i>M. anderseni</i> specializes on brood raiding from <i>I. reburrus</i> nests, and this raiding is for predation, not dulosis. Both behavior (running speed) and chemical mimicry are likely used in combination to facilitate this specialized foraging. Additional research is still needed to determine the source (e.g. genetic versus environmental) of <i>M. anderseni’s</i> hydrocarbon profiles, and if geographic variation in host use and chemical mimicry exists.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Ecology and mechanisms of brood raiding of Iridomyrmex by the thermophilic ant, Melophorus anderseni

  • Benjamin D. Hoffmann,
  • Sara Hu,
  • Adrian A. Smith,
  • Andrew V. Suarez,
  • Terry McGlynn

摘要

Melophorus anderseni is a thermophilic ant species that nests near colonies of Iridomyrmex on which it conducts brood raids. We examined its colony founding behavior and foraging ecology to evaluate possible mechanisms that may facilitate interspecific nest raiding, as well as determine if it is a parasite or specialist predator. Specifically, we (1) examined colony establishment and survival, (2) patterns of worker activity (walking speed, foraging and raiding behavior), and (3) compared cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of M. anderseni and I. reburrus workers. Following nuptial flights, M. anderseni queens established colonies in clusters around I. reburrus colonies, with an average distance to the nearest Iridomyrmex nest of 133.1(± 8.9) cm (range 25 to 650 cm). The average number of M. anderseni queens per Iridomyrmex nest entrance was 8.4 (± 1.9), and the average distance to the nearest M. anderseni neighbor was 44.9 (± 5.3) cm (range 10 to 233 cm). Queen survival was lower in clusters that were farther from the nearest I. reburrus nest or to other M. anderseni queens. Iridomyrmex reburrus activity was negatively related to soil temperature, with no activity occurring above 50 °C. In contrast, M. anderseni activity was positively related to temperature with peak activity occurring just above 50 °C. Melophorus anderseni worker activity commenced when soil temperatures exceeded 37.4 °C, and activity increased until mid-day. Activity ceased in the afternoon at temperatures lower than that for activity commencement, on average at 36.7 °C. Activity of M. anderseni at I. reburrus nests followed that of activity at M. anderseni nests. Workers of M. anderseni had an average foraging duration of 63 s and a mean foraging distance of 249 cm. Of the 49 foragers followed, 42 (86%) entered an I. reburrus nest, and 32 (76.2%) of those entered the closest nest entrance. Of the 1,444 observations of M. anderseni exiting an I. reburrus nest, they stole an item in 122 (8.4%) instances, with 117 (95.9%) of these items being brood. Additionally, workers of M. anderseni had faster running speeds (mean 9.72 cm/s, peak 18 cm/s) than I. reburrus workers (7.05 cm/s). On average, the speed of M. anderseni exiting an I. reburrus nest was more than twice the speed of I. reburrus. Extracts of I. reburrus and M. anderseni worker cuticular hydrocarbon profiles were qualitatively identical in that no compounds were unique to either species. Saturated hydrocarbons with chain lengths between 25 and 29 carbons comprised the majority of hydrocarbons found on the cuticle of both species. The relative abundances of compounds within the profiles of both species were also similar. In contrast, two sympatric Iridomyrmex and Melophorus species shared very few compounds with I. reburrus and M. anderseni. During all observations of the M. anderseni nests, no I. sanguineus workers were observed within or exiting the nest entrance, indicating that stolen brood had been consumed. Our results support that M. anderseni specializes on brood raiding from I. reburrus nests, and this raiding is for predation, not dulosis. Both behavior (running speed) and chemical mimicry are likely used in combination to facilitate this specialized foraging. Additional research is still needed to determine the source (e.g. genetic versus environmental) of M. anderseni’s hydrocarbon profiles, and if geographic variation in host use and chemical mimicry exists.