<p>In a seminal work published in 1930, the astrophysicist Takehiko Matukuma proposed the equation <Equation ID="Equ17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} -\Delta u = \frac{1}{1+|x|^2} u^\alpha \quad \text {in } \textbf{R}^3 \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </mfrac> <msup> <mi>u</mi> <mi>α</mi> </msup> <mspace width="1em" /> <mtext>in</mtext> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">R</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>as a mathematical model to describe the dynamics of globular cluster of stars. Here <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha &gt;1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(u&gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the gravitational potential with <Equation ID="Equ18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{4\pi } \int _{\textbf{R}^3} \frac{1}{1+|x|^2}u^\alpha dx \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mn>4</mn> <mi>π</mi> </mrow> </mfrac> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">R</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </msub> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </mfrac> <msup> <mi>u</mi> <mi>α</mi> </msup> <mi>d</mi> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>representing the total mass. While the case <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha &gt;1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> has been at the center of the research of the equation and many interesting results have been drawn, much less is known in the regime <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \le 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In this work, we are interested <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(C^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>C</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-solutions to the equation in the case <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \le 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n \ge 3\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We prove that actually the equation originally posed in <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{R}^3\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">R</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> admits no classical solution if <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha \le 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>≤</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. However, this is no longer true in higher-dimensional spaces <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n \ge 4\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We also highlight further intriguing differences between the cases <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{R}^3\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">R</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textbf{R}^n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold">R</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n \ge 4.\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On the Matukuma equation in \(\textbf{R}^n\) and beyond

  • Cao Thanh Tinh

摘要

In a seminal work published in 1930, the astrophysicist Takehiko Matukuma proposed the equation \(\begin{aligned} -\Delta u = \frac{1}{1+|x|^2} u^\alpha \quad \text {in } \textbf{R}^3 \end{aligned}\) - Δ u = 1 1 + | x | 2 u α in R 3 as a mathematical model to describe the dynamics of globular cluster of stars. Here \(\alpha >1\) α > 1 and \(u>0\) u > 0 is the gravitational potential with \(\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{4\pi } \int _{\textbf{R}^3} \frac{1}{1+|x|^2}u^\alpha dx \end{aligned}\) 1 4 π R 3 1 1 + | x | 2 u α d x representing the total mass. While the case \(\alpha >1\) α > 1 has been at the center of the research of the equation and many interesting results have been drawn, much less is known in the regime \(\alpha \le 1\) α 1 . In this work, we are interested \(C^2\) C 2 -solutions to the equation in the case \(\alpha \le 1\) α 1 and \(n \ge 3\) n 3 . We prove that actually the equation originally posed in \(\textbf{R}^3\) R 3 admits no classical solution if \(\alpha \le 1\) α 1 . However, this is no longer true in higher-dimensional spaces \(n \ge 4\) n 4 . We also highlight further intriguing differences between the cases \(\textbf{R}^3\) R 3 and \(\textbf{R}^n\) R n with \(n \ge 4.\) n 4 .