<p>This paper presents a numerical scheme for approximating the solution of a three-dimensional time-fractional advection–diffusion equation (TFADE) that exhibits a weak singularity at <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2603_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="38" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(t=0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The temporal fractional derivative is discretized using the <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2603_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="58" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(L2-1_\sigma \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mo>-</mo> <msub> <mn>1</mn> <mi>σ</mi> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> scheme on non-uniform meshes, while the space derivative is discretized using a fourth-order compact finite difference (CFD) scheme. The resultant fully discrete scheme is computationally expensive. We propose an alternating direction implicit (ADI) scheme to reduce the computational complexity of the method. A theoretical analysis of the stability and convergence of the proposed numerical method is carried out using the <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2603_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="23" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(H^1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>H</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-norm and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2603_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(L^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-norm. The method’s performance, robustness and accuracy are tested through numerical experiments. Additionally, a comparison of numerical results obtained on uniform, graded and variable graded meshes is provided to highlight the advantages of the proposed non-uniform mesh method over the uniform mesh method. We compare the numerical results obtained by the present method and the methods reported in Zhou et al. (Numer Algorithms 96:1533–1551, 2024) and Roul and Rohil (Comput Math Appl 126:1–13, 2022). The numerical results presented both in tabular and graphical forms confirm the scheme’s high accuracy and versatility.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A high-order numerical method and its analysis for solving a three-dimensional time-fractional advection–diffusion model

  • Pradip Roul,
  • Vivek Pathak

摘要

This paper presents a numerical scheme for approximating the solution of a three-dimensional time-fractional advection–diffusion equation (TFADE) that exhibits a weak singularity at \(t=0\) t = 0 . The temporal fractional derivative is discretized using the \(L2-1_\sigma \) L 2 - 1 σ scheme on non-uniform meshes, while the space derivative is discretized using a fourth-order compact finite difference (CFD) scheme. The resultant fully discrete scheme is computationally expensive. We propose an alternating direction implicit (ADI) scheme to reduce the computational complexity of the method. A theoretical analysis of the stability and convergence of the proposed numerical method is carried out using the \(H^1\) H 1 -norm and \(L^2\) L 2 -norm. The method’s performance, robustness and accuracy are tested through numerical experiments. Additionally, a comparison of numerical results obtained on uniform, graded and variable graded meshes is provided to highlight the advantages of the proposed non-uniform mesh method over the uniform mesh method. We compare the numerical results obtained by the present method and the methods reported in Zhou et al. (Numer Algorithms 96:1533–1551, 2024) and Roul and Rohil (Comput Math Appl 126:1–13, 2022). The numerical results presented both in tabular and graphical forms confirm the scheme’s high accuracy and versatility.