<p>In the present paper, we investigate the existence, multiplicity and concentration of normalized solutions to the following fractional Schrödinger equation with potential <Equation ID="Equ35"> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2510_Article_Equ35.gif" Format="GIF" Height="75" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="313" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} (-\Delta )^s u+V(\varepsilon x)u+\lambda u=f(u),~ x\in \mathbb {R}^N,\\ \displaystyle \int \limits _{\mathbb {R}^N}|u|^2\mathrm{{d}}x=a^2, \end{array}\right. } \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mfenced open="{"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>s</mi> </msup> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ε</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt" /> <mi>x</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msup> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"> <mrow> <mrow /> <munder> <mo movablelimits="false">∫</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msup> </munder> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">d</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mi>a</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mstyle> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>where <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2510_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="13" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="71" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(0&lt;s&lt;1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2510_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="48" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N\ge 2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2510_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="62" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(a, \ \varepsilon &gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="4pt" /> <mi>ε</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2510_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="101" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(V \in C(\mathbb {R}^N, \mathbb {R})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>V</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi>C</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msup> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="33_2025_2510_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="15" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\lambda \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>λ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is an unknown parameter that will appear as a Lagrange multiplier, <i>f</i> is a mass subcritical and Sobolev subcritical nonlinearity. Under fairly general assumptions about <i>f</i> and a global condition about <i>V</i>, with the aid of minimization techniques and Lusternik–Schnirelmann category theory, we study the relation between the numbers of normalized solutions and the topology of the set where the potential <i>V</i> attains its minimum value. In addition, we obtain the decay behavior of normalized solutions. Finally, by using of the cut-off technique we also consider the Sobolev supercritical case that has not been considered about the study of normalized solutions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Concentration of normalized solutions for non-autonomous fractional Schrödinger equations

  • Quanqing Li,
  • Vicenţiu D. Rădulescu,
  • Jian Zhang,
  • Wen Zhang

摘要

In the present paper, we investigate the existence, multiplicity and concentration of normalized solutions to the following fractional Schrödinger equation with potential \( {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} (-\Delta )^s u+V(\varepsilon x)u+\lambda u=f(u),~ x\in \mathbb {R}^N,\\ \displaystyle \int \limits _{\mathbb {R}^N}|u|^2\mathrm{{d}}x=a^2, \end{array}\right. } \) ( - Δ ) s u + V ( ε x ) u + λ u = f ( u ) , x R N , R N | u | 2 d x = a 2 , where \(0<s<1\) 0 < s < 1 , \(N\ge 2\) N 2 , \(a, \ \varepsilon >0\) a , ε > 0 , \(V \in C(\mathbb {R}^N, \mathbb {R})\) V C ( R N , R ) , \(\lambda \) λ is an unknown parameter that will appear as a Lagrange multiplier, f is a mass subcritical and Sobolev subcritical nonlinearity. Under fairly general assumptions about f and a global condition about V, with the aid of minimization techniques and Lusternik–Schnirelmann category theory, we study the relation between the numbers of normalized solutions and the topology of the set where the potential V attains its minimum value. In addition, we obtain the decay behavior of normalized solutions. Finally, by using of the cut-off technique we also consider the Sobolev supercritical case that has not been considered about the study of normalized solutions.