<p>Given a simply connected solvable Lie group <i>G</i>, there always exists a NIL-affine action <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho : G \rightarrow \text {Aff}(H)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ρ</mi> <mo>:</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mtext>Aff</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>H</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on a nilpotent Lie group <i>H</i> such that <i>G</i> acts simply transitively. The question whether this is always possible for <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(H = {\mathbb R}^n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>H</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> abelian was known as Milnor’s question, with a negative answer due to a counterexample of Benoist. This counterexample is based on a correspondence between certain affine actions <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\rho : G \rightarrow \text {Aff}({\mathbb R}^n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ρ</mi> <mo>:</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mtext>Aff</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and left-symmetric structures on the corresponding Lie algebra <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathfrak {g} \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">g</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of <i>G</i>, where simply transitive actions correspond exactly to the so-called complete left-symmetric structures. In general however, the question remains open which solvable Lie groups <i>G</i> can act on which nilpotent Lie groups <i>H</i>. A natural candidate for a correspondence on the Lie algebra level is the notion of post-Lie algebra structures, which form the natural generalization of left-symmetric structures. In this paper, we show that every simply transitive NIL-affine action of <i>G</i> on a nilpotent Lie group <i>H</i> indeed induces a post-Lie algebra structure on the pair of Lie algebras <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((\mathfrak {g} ,\mathfrak {h} )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">g</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">h</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Moreover, we discuss a new notion of completeness for these structures in the case that <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathfrak {h} \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">h</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is 2-step nilpotent, equivalent but different from the known definition for <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(H = {\mathbb R}^n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>H</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We then show that simply transitive actions exactly correspond to complete post-Lie algebra structures in the 2-step nilpotent case. However, the question how to define completeness in higher nilpotency classes remains open, as we illustrate with an example in the 3-step nilpotent case.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On post-Lie Algebra Structures Coming from Simply Transitive NIL-Affine Actions

  • Jonas Deré,
  • Marcos Origlia

摘要

Given a simply connected solvable Lie group G, there always exists a NIL-affine action \(\rho : G \rightarrow \text {Aff}(H)\) ρ : G Aff ( H ) on a nilpotent Lie group H such that G acts simply transitively. The question whether this is always possible for \(H = {\mathbb R}^n\) H = R n abelian was known as Milnor’s question, with a negative answer due to a counterexample of Benoist. This counterexample is based on a correspondence between certain affine actions \(\rho : G \rightarrow \text {Aff}({\mathbb R}^n)\) ρ : G Aff ( R n ) and left-symmetric structures on the corresponding Lie algebra \(\mathfrak {g} \) g of G, where simply transitive actions correspond exactly to the so-called complete left-symmetric structures. In general however, the question remains open which solvable Lie groups G can act on which nilpotent Lie groups H. A natural candidate for a correspondence on the Lie algebra level is the notion of post-Lie algebra structures, which form the natural generalization of left-symmetric structures. In this paper, we show that every simply transitive NIL-affine action of G on a nilpotent Lie group H indeed induces a post-Lie algebra structure on the pair of Lie algebras \((\mathfrak {g} ,\mathfrak {h} )\) ( g , h ) . Moreover, we discuss a new notion of completeness for these structures in the case that \(\mathfrak {h} \) h is 2-step nilpotent, equivalent but different from the known definition for \(H = {\mathbb R}^n\) H = R n . We then show that simply transitive actions exactly correspond to complete post-Lie algebra structures in the 2-step nilpotent case. However, the question how to define completeness in higher nilpotency classes remains open, as we illustrate with an example in the 3-step nilpotent case.