<p>We consider blow-up solutions of a semilinear wave equation with a <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="30_2025_1083_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\log \log \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>log</mo> <mo>log</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> perturbation of the power nonlinearity in the subconformal case, and show that the blow-up rate is given by the solution of the associated ODE which has the same blow-up time. In fact, our result shows an upper bound and a lower bound of the blow-up rate, both proportional to the blow-up solution of the associated ODE. As for the upper bound, the main difficulty comes from the fact that the PDE is not scaling invariant. Our argument is a delicate adaptation of the original approach introduced by Hamza and Zaag for the <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="30_2025_1083_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="22" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\log \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>log</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> perturbation of the pure power nonlinearity (see [<CitationRef CitationID="CR9">9</CitationRef>]). It mainly relies on the design of a Lyapunov functional and the use of a blow-up criterion in the similarity variables’ setting, together with some energy, nonlinear, and interpolation estimates. As for the proof of the lower bound, we consider our argument as a major contribution, since the argument for the pure power case cannot be adapted when the scale invariance breaks down.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The blow-up rate for a loglog non-scaling invariant semilinear wave equation

  • Tristan Roy,
  • Hatem Zaag

摘要

We consider blow-up solutions of a semilinear wave equation with a \(\log \log \) log log perturbation of the power nonlinearity in the subconformal case, and show that the blow-up rate is given by the solution of the associated ODE which has the same blow-up time. In fact, our result shows an upper bound and a lower bound of the blow-up rate, both proportional to the blow-up solution of the associated ODE. As for the upper bound, the main difficulty comes from the fact that the PDE is not scaling invariant. Our argument is a delicate adaptation of the original approach introduced by Hamza and Zaag for the \(\log \) log perturbation of the pure power nonlinearity (see [9]). It mainly relies on the design of a Lyapunov functional and the use of a blow-up criterion in the similarity variables’ setting, together with some energy, nonlinear, and interpolation estimates. As for the proof of the lower bound, we consider our argument as a major contribution, since the argument for the pure power case cannot be adapted when the scale invariance breaks down.