<p>Let <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {C}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be the set of complex numbers, and let <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal P\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be a collection of complex polynomial maps in several variables. Assuming at least one <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(P\in \mathcal P\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> depends on at least two variables, we classify all possibilities for the structure <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((\mathbb {C};\mathcal P)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> up to definable equivalence. In particular, outside a short list of exceptions, we show that <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((\mathbb {C};\mathcal P)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> <mo>;</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> always defines <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(+\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>+</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\times \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>×</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Our tools include Zilber’s Restricted Trichotomy, as well as the classification of symmetric non-expanding pairs of polynomials over <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb C\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> from arithmetic combinatorics. Along the way, we also give a new condition for a reduct <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="MediaObjects/29_2025_1086_IEq9_HTML.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="120" Type="Linedraw" Width="89" /> </InlineMediaObject> </InlineEquation> of a smooth curve over an algebraically closed field to recover all constructible subsets of powers of <i>M</i>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Model theory of complex numbers with polynomial functions

  • Benjamin Castle,
  • Chieu-Minh Tran

摘要

Let \(\mathbb {C}\) C be the set of complex numbers, and let \(\mathcal P\) P be a collection of complex polynomial maps in several variables. Assuming at least one \(P\in \mathcal P\) P P depends on at least two variables, we classify all possibilities for the structure \((\mathbb {C};\mathcal P)\) ( C ; P ) up to definable equivalence. In particular, outside a short list of exceptions, we show that \((\mathbb {C};\mathcal P)\) ( C ; P ) always defines \(+\) + and \(\times \) × . Our tools include Zilber’s Restricted Trichotomy, as well as the classification of symmetric non-expanding pairs of polynomials over \(\mathbb C\) C from arithmetic combinatorics. Along the way, we also give a new condition for a reduct of a smooth curve over an algebraically closed field to recover all constructible subsets of powers of M.