<p>The <i>k</i>-dimensional functional order property (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {FOP}_k\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mo>FOP</mo> <mi>k</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) is a combinatorial property of a <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="51" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((k+1)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-partitioned formula. This notion arose in work of Terry and Wolf [<CitationRef CitationID="CR59">59</CitationRef>, <CitationRef CitationID="CR60">60</CitationRef>], which identified <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="53" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {NFOP}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mo>NFOP</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as a ternary analogue of stability in the context of two finitary combinatorial problems related to hypergraph regularity and arithmetic regularity. In this paper we show <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {NFOP}_k\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mo>NFOP</mo> <mi>k</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> has equally strong implications in model-theoretic classification theory, where its behavior as a <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="51" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((k+1)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-ary version of stability is in close analogy to the behavior of <i>k</i>-dependence as a <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="51" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((k+1)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-ary version of <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="30" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {NIP}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>NIP</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Our results include several new characterizations of <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {NFOP}_k\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mo>NFOP</mo> <mi>k</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, including a characterization in terms of collapsing indiscernibles, combinatorial recharacterizations, and a characterization in terms of type-counting when <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="41" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k=2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. As a corollary of our collapsing theorem, we show <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="55" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {NFOP}_k\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mo>NFOP</mo> <mi>k</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is closed under Boolean combinations, and that <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="43" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {FOP}_k\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mo>FOP</mo> <mi>k</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> can always be witnessed by a formula where all but one variable have length 1. When <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="41" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k=2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we prove a composition lemma analogous to that of Chernikov and Hempel from the setting of 2-dependence. Using this, we provide a new class of algebraic examples of <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="53" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {NFOP}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mo>NFOP</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> theories. Specifically, we show that if <i>T</i> is the theory of an infinite dimensional vector space over a field <i>K</i>, equipped with a bilinear form satisfying certain properties, then <i>T</i> is <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="29_2025_1055_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="53" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\operatorname {NFOP}_2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mo>NFOP</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> if and only if <i>K</i> is stable. Along the way we provide a corrected and reorganized proof of Granger’s quantifier elimination and completeness results for these theories.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Higher arity stability and the functional order property

  • A. Abd Aldaim,
  • G. Conant,
  • C. Terry

摘要

The k-dimensional functional order property ( \(\operatorname {FOP}_k\) FOP k ) is a combinatorial property of a \((k+1)\) ( k + 1 ) -partitioned formula. This notion arose in work of Terry and Wolf [59, 60], which identified \(\operatorname {NFOP}_2\) NFOP 2 as a ternary analogue of stability in the context of two finitary combinatorial problems related to hypergraph regularity and arithmetic regularity. In this paper we show \(\operatorname {NFOP}_k\) NFOP k has equally strong implications in model-theoretic classification theory, where its behavior as a \((k+1)\) ( k + 1 ) -ary version of stability is in close analogy to the behavior of k-dependence as a \((k+1)\) ( k + 1 ) -ary version of \(\operatorname {NIP}\) NIP . Our results include several new characterizations of \(\operatorname {NFOP}_k\) NFOP k , including a characterization in terms of collapsing indiscernibles, combinatorial recharacterizations, and a characterization in terms of type-counting when \(k=2\) k = 2 . As a corollary of our collapsing theorem, we show \(\operatorname {NFOP}_k\) NFOP k is closed under Boolean combinations, and that \(\operatorname {FOP}_k\) FOP k can always be witnessed by a formula where all but one variable have length 1. When \(k=2\) k = 2 , we prove a composition lemma analogous to that of Chernikov and Hempel from the setting of 2-dependence. Using this, we provide a new class of algebraic examples of \(\operatorname {NFOP}_2\) NFOP 2 theories. Specifically, we show that if T is the theory of an infinite dimensional vector space over a field K, equipped with a bilinear form satisfying certain properties, then T is \(\operatorname {NFOP}_2\) NFOP 2 if and only if K is stable. Along the way we provide a corrected and reorganized proof of Granger’s quantifier elimination and completeness results for these theories.