<p>The Cartan decomposition of a semisimple Lie algebra is pivotal in both theoretical exploration and practical application. It generalizes the classical spectral, polar, and singular value decompositions found in linear algebra. This paper explores an advanced refinement of the Cartan decomposition of <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="46" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathfrak {su}(2^{n})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">su</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, arising from the parameterization of a Hamiltonian for quantum simulation. Specifically, given an <b>AI</b>-type Cartan decomposition <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="69" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {g}} = {\mathfrak {k}} \oplus {\mathfrak {p}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">g</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">k</mi> <mo>⊕</mo> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">p</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of any Lie subalgebra <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="13" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="10" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {g}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">g</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="46" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathfrak {su}(2^{n})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">su</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="71" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {p}} = \widetilde{{\mathfrak {p}}} \oplus {\mathfrak {h}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">p</mi> <mo stretchy="true">~</mo> </mover> <mo>⊕</mo> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">h</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {h}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">h</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the maximal abelian subalgebra in <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="10" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {p}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">p</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, it is revealed that both the subalgebra <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="8" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {k}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">k</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and the corresponding <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="12" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\widetilde{{\mathfrak {p}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">p</mi> <mo stretchy="true">~</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (which is generally not a subalgebra) can further be partitioned, respectively, as the direct sums of equal-dimensional commutative Lie subalgebras. With respect to the involution <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq12.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="86" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta (g)=-g^{\top }\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mo>-</mo> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mi>⊤</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, any Lie subalgebra <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="13" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="10" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {g}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">g</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="46" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathfrak {su}(2^{n})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">su</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with nondegenerate Cartan decomposition can thus be fully decomposed as the orthogonal direct sum of <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {h}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">h</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and pairs of commutative Lie subalgebras over <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="8" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {k}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">k</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="12" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\widetilde{{\mathfrak {p}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">p</mi> <mo stretchy="true">~</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, all of which, except <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="25_2025_2478_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="11" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathfrak {h}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="fraktur">h</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, share the same dimension.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On the Refinement of Cartan Decomposition: An Implicit Commutative Substructure in \(\mathfrak {su}(2^{n})\)

  • Moody Chu

摘要

The Cartan decomposition of a semisimple Lie algebra is pivotal in both theoretical exploration and practical application. It generalizes the classical spectral, polar, and singular value decompositions found in linear algebra. This paper explores an advanced refinement of the Cartan decomposition of \(\mathfrak {su}(2^{n})\) su ( 2 n ) , arising from the parameterization of a Hamiltonian for quantum simulation. Specifically, given an AI-type Cartan decomposition \({\mathfrak {g}} = {\mathfrak {k}} \oplus {\mathfrak {p}}\) g = k p of any Lie subalgebra \({\mathfrak {g}}\) g in \(\mathfrak {su}(2^{n})\) su ( 2 n ) , where \({\mathfrak {p}} = \widetilde{{\mathfrak {p}}} \oplus {\mathfrak {h}}\) p = p ~ h and \({\mathfrak {h}}\) h is the maximal abelian subalgebra in \({\mathfrak {p}}\) p , it is revealed that both the subalgebra \({\mathfrak {k}}\) k and the corresponding \(\widetilde{{\mathfrak {p}}}\) p ~ (which is generally not a subalgebra) can further be partitioned, respectively, as the direct sums of equal-dimensional commutative Lie subalgebras. With respect to the involution \(\theta (g)=-g^{\top }\) θ ( g ) = - g , any Lie subalgebra \({\mathfrak {g}}\) g in \(\mathfrak {su}(2^{n})\) su ( 2 n ) with nondegenerate Cartan decomposition can thus be fully decomposed as the orthogonal direct sum of \({\mathfrak {h}}\) h and pairs of commutative Lie subalgebras over \({\mathfrak {k}}\) k and \(\widetilde{{\mathfrak {p}}}\) p ~ , all of which, except \({\mathfrak {h}}\) h , share the same dimension.