<p>This paper proposes the use of teaching–learning-based optimization on the Kausel-Roesset stiffness matrix (TLBO-KRSM) for estimating the site-specific shear wave velocity profile (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="24_2025_3846_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{s})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in the active multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) test. Global search operations are carried out by teaching factor through the teaching–learning process in the TLBO algorithm to obtain converged solutions. The TLBO algorithm (free of control parameter) is expected to predict the <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="24_2025_3846_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{s}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> profile more accurately than traditional optimization techniques (e.g., genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE), artificial bee colony optimization (ABCO), and particle swarm optimization (PSO)). The control parameters of&#xa0;GA, DE, ABCO, and PSO are not sufficiently calibrated, so&#xa0;there is a high possibility of misinterpreting the site-specific <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="24_2025_3846_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{s}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> profile. It utilizes the wavelengths and phase velocities of the experimental fundamental mode dispersion curve to fix the search space of soil layer thicknesses and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="24_2025_3846_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{s}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The proposed TLBO-KRSM algorithm and the other optimization techniques are examined on real field data sets by performing the MASW tests at the IIT Gandhinagar campus. The MASW test results are validated with downhole seismic tests along with the four datasets from various literature studies. When comparing the misfit error and the site-specific <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="24_2025_3846_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{s}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> profiles, the TLBO-KRSM algorithm has been found to be superior and requires less computational effort to locate the low misfit region to other optimization algorithms for estimating the <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="24_2025_3846_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{s}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> profiles.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On the Applicability of Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization to Estimate the \({{\varvec{V}}}_{{\varvec{s}}}\) Profile in Active MASW Test

  • Prabhakar Vishwakarma,
  • Amit Prashant

摘要

This paper proposes the use of teaching–learning-based optimization on the Kausel-Roesset stiffness matrix (TLBO-KRSM) for estimating the site-specific shear wave velocity profile ( \({V}_{s})\) V s ) in the active multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) test. Global search operations are carried out by teaching factor through the teaching–learning process in the TLBO algorithm to obtain converged solutions. The TLBO algorithm (free of control parameter) is expected to predict the \({V}_{s}\) V s profile more accurately than traditional optimization techniques (e.g., genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE), artificial bee colony optimization (ABCO), and particle swarm optimization (PSO)). The control parameters of GA, DE, ABCO, and PSO are not sufficiently calibrated, so there is a high possibility of misinterpreting the site-specific \({V}_{s}\) V s profile. It utilizes the wavelengths and phase velocities of the experimental fundamental mode dispersion curve to fix the search space of soil layer thicknesses and \({V}_{s}\) V s . The proposed TLBO-KRSM algorithm and the other optimization techniques are examined on real field data sets by performing the MASW tests at the IIT Gandhinagar campus. The MASW test results are validated with downhole seismic tests along with the four datasets from various literature studies. When comparing the misfit error and the site-specific \({V}_{s}\) V s profiles, the TLBO-KRSM algorithm has been found to be superior and requires less computational effort to locate the low misfit region to other optimization algorithms for estimating the \({V}_{s}\) V s profiles.