<p>We show that the collective effect of <i>N</i> rigid bodies <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="21_2025_944_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="68" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((\mathcal {S}_{n,N})_{n=1}^N\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">S</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of diameters <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="21_2025_944_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((r_{n,N})_{n=1}^N\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> immersed in an incompressible non–Newtonian fluid is negligible in the asymptotic limit <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="21_2025_944_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="63" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N \rightarrow \infty \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mi>∞</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> as long as their total packing volume <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="21_2025_944_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="25" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="74" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sum _{n=1}^N r_{n,N}^d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mo>∑</mo> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msubsup> <msubsup> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msubsup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="21_2025_944_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="56" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(d=2,3\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> tends to zero exponentially – <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="21_2025_944_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="25" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="130" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\sum _{n=1}^N r_{n,N}^d \approx A^{-N}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mo>∑</mo> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> <mi>N</mi> </msubsup> <msubsup> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msubsup> <mo>≈</mo> <msup> <mi>A</mi> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> – for a certain constant <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="21_2025_944_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A &gt; 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The result is rather surprising and in a sharp contrast with the associated homogenization problem, where the same number of obstacles can completely stop the fluid motion in the case of shear thickening viscosity. A large class of non–Newtonian fluids is included, for which the viscous stress is a subdifferential of a convex potential.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On the Effect of a Large Cloud of Rigid Particles on the Motion of an Incompressible Non–Newtonian Fluid

  • Eduard Feireisl,
  • Arnab Roy,
  • Arghir Zarnescu

摘要

We show that the collective effect of N rigid bodies \((\mathcal {S}_{n,N})_{n=1}^N\) ( S n , N ) n = 1 N of diameters \((r_{n,N})_{n=1}^N\) ( r n , N ) n = 1 N immersed in an incompressible non–Newtonian fluid is negligible in the asymptotic limit \(N \rightarrow \infty \) N as long as their total packing volume \(\sum _{n=1}^N r_{n,N}^d\) n = 1 N r n , N d , \(d=2,3\) d = 2 , 3 tends to zero exponentially – \({\sum _{n=1}^N r_{n,N}^d \approx A^{-N}}\) n = 1 N r n , N d A - N – for a certain constant \(A > 1\) A > 1 . The result is rather surprising and in a sharp contrast with the associated homogenization problem, where the same number of obstacles can completely stop the fluid motion in the case of shear thickening viscosity. A large class of non–Newtonian fluids is included, for which the viscous stress is a subdifferential of a convex potential.