<p>Single-cell sequencing (sc-seq) technologies have revolutionized biomedical research by enabling high-resolution analysis of cellular heterogeneity across multiple dimensions, including transcriptomics, epigenomics, and spatial profiling. These advances have led to the development of comprehensive single-cell atlases—reference maps of cell types and states across tissues and organisms, such as the Human Cell Atlas and Mouse Cell Atlas. These resources are foundational frameworks for investigating gene regulation, tissue architecture, and disease mechanisms. However, variations in biological focus, species representation, and dataset scale among available atlases necessitate a systematic comparative evaluation. This review provides an in-depth analysis of current single-cell atlases, assessing their scope, strengths, and limitations based on an updated framework derived from Hrovatin et al. We discuss the transformative role of sc-seq in oncology, immunology, and infectious disease research and highlight critical gaps in atlas development, including underrepresented species and tissue types. Finally, we propose key recommendations to guide future efforts in expanding, integrating, and standardizing single-cell atlas initiatives for enhanced translational impact.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A comparative review of single-cell atlases: mapping cellular diversity across species and tissues

  • Keyun Look,
  • Pei En Goh,
  • Long Chiau Ming,
  • Shi Hui Law,
  • Sang Loon Tan,
  • Ee Wern Tan,
  • Hooi Leng Ser,
  • Bey Hing Goh

摘要

Single-cell sequencing (sc-seq) technologies have revolutionized biomedical research by enabling high-resolution analysis of cellular heterogeneity across multiple dimensions, including transcriptomics, epigenomics, and spatial profiling. These advances have led to the development of comprehensive single-cell atlases—reference maps of cell types and states across tissues and organisms, such as the Human Cell Atlas and Mouse Cell Atlas. These resources are foundational frameworks for investigating gene regulation, tissue architecture, and disease mechanisms. However, variations in biological focus, species representation, and dataset scale among available atlases necessitate a systematic comparative evaluation. This review provides an in-depth analysis of current single-cell atlases, assessing their scope, strengths, and limitations based on an updated framework derived from Hrovatin et al. We discuss the transformative role of sc-seq in oncology, immunology, and infectious disease research and highlight critical gaps in atlas development, including underrepresented species and tissue types. Finally, we propose key recommendations to guide future efforts in expanding, integrating, and standardizing single-cell atlas initiatives for enhanced translational impact.