<p>Hou, Krattenthaler, and Sun have introduced two <i>q</i>-analogues of a remarkable series for <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13_2024_2094_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi ^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>π</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> due to Guillera, and these <i>q</i>-identities were, respectively, proved with the use of a <i>q</i>-analogue of a Wilf–Zeilberger pair provided by Guillera and with the use of <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13_2024_2094_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="24" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\( _{3}\phi _{2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mn>3</mn> <mrow /> </mmultiscripts> <msub> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-transforms. We prove a <i>q</i>-analogue of Guillera’s formula for <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="13_2024_2094_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="18" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi ^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>π</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> that is inequivalent to previously known <i>q</i>-analogues of the same formula due to Guillera, including the Hou–Krattenthaler–Sun <i>q</i>-identities and a subsequent <i>q</i>-identity due to Wei. In contrast to previously known <i>q</i>-analogues of Guillera’s formula, our new <i>q</i>-analogue involves another free parameter apart from the <i>q</i>-parameter. Our derivation of this new result relies on the <i>q</i>-analogue of Zeilberger’s algorithm.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A further q-analogue of a formula due to Guillera

  • John M. Campbell

摘要

Hou, Krattenthaler, and Sun have introduced two q-analogues of a remarkable series for \(\pi ^2\) π 2 due to Guillera, and these q-identities were, respectively, proved with the use of a q-analogue of a Wilf–Zeilberger pair provided by Guillera and with the use of \( _{3}\phi _{2}\) 3 ϕ 2 -transforms. We prove a q-analogue of Guillera’s formula for \(\pi ^2\) π 2 that is inequivalent to previously known q-analogues of the same formula due to Guillera, including the Hou–Krattenthaler–Sun q-identities and a subsequent q-identity due to Wei. In contrast to previously known q-analogues of Guillera’s formula, our new q-analogue involves another free parameter apart from the q-parameter. Our derivation of this new result relies on the q-analogue of Zeilberger’s algorithm.