<p>In this paper, we consider the following Kirchhoff–Schrödinger–Poisson system: <Equation ID="Equ83"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle -\left( a+b\int _{\mathbb {R}^{3}}|\nabla u|^{2}\textrm{d}x\right) \Delta u+ u+\mu K(x) \phi u=f(x)|u|^{p-2}u+g(x)|u|^{q-2}u &amp; \text { in }\mathbb {R}^{3},\\ -\Delta \phi =K(x)u^{2} &amp; \text { in }\mathbb {R}^{3},\\ \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mfenced open="{"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mstyle displaystyle="true" scriptlevel="0"> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>a</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>b</mi> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </msub> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mtext>d</mtext> <mi>x</mi> </mfenced> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>K</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi>f</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>q</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mi>u</mi> </mrow> </mstyle> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mtext>in</mtext> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>3</mn> </msup> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mrow /> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>K</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mi>u</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <mtext>in</mtext> <mspace width="0.333333em" /> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>3</mn> </msup> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </mfenced> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>where <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(a,b,\mu &gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>μ</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(1&lt;q&lt;2&lt;p&lt;\min \{4, 2^{*}\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>q</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mo movablelimits="true">min</mo> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mmultiscripts> <mn>2</mn> <mrow /> <mrow> <mrow /> <mo>∗</mo> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2^{*}=2N/(N-2)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mmultiscripts> <mn>2</mn> <mrow /> <mrow> <mrow /> <mo>∗</mo> </mrow> </mmultiscripts> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mi>N</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Under some suitable conditions on functions <i>K</i>, <i>f</i>, and <i>g</i>, we first prove that a bounded Palais–Smale sequence possesses a convergent subsequence by a novel method. Then two negative-energy nontrivial solutions are obtained via the Ekeland variational principle. Furthermore, by imposing some additional assumptions on <i>g</i> and combining the filtration of Nehari manifold, we can prove that the corresponding energy functional is bounded below on a sub-manifold of Nehari manifold and get three nontrivial solutions for the above problem.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Nontrivial Solutions for the Kirchhoff–Schrödinger–Poisson System with Concave–Convex Nonlinearities

  • Guofeng Che,
  • Zukang Chen,
  • Shanni Zhu

摘要

In this paper, we consider the following Kirchhoff–Schrödinger–Poisson system: \(\begin{aligned} \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \displaystyle -\left( a+b\int _{\mathbb {R}^{3}}|\nabla u|^{2}\textrm{d}x\right) \Delta u+ u+\mu K(x) \phi u=f(x)|u|^{p-2}u+g(x)|u|^{q-2}u & \text { in }\mathbb {R}^{3},\\ -\Delta \phi =K(x)u^{2} & \text { in }\mathbb {R}^{3},\\ \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}\) - a + b R 3 | u | 2 d x Δ u + u + μ K ( x ) ϕ u = f ( x ) | u | p - 2 u + g ( x ) | u | q - 2 u in R 3 , - Δ ϕ = K ( x ) u 2 in R 3 , where \(a,b,\mu >0\) a , b , μ > 0 , \(1<q<2<p<\min \{4, 2^{*}\}\) 1 < q < 2 < p < min { 4 , 2 } , \(2^{*}=2N/(N-2)\) 2 = 2 N / ( N - 2 ) . Under some suitable conditions on functions K, f, and g, we first prove that a bounded Palais–Smale sequence possesses a convergent subsequence by a novel method. Then two negative-energy nontrivial solutions are obtained via the Ekeland variational principle. Furthermore, by imposing some additional assumptions on g and combining the filtration of Nehari manifold, we can prove that the corresponding energy functional is bounded below on a sub-manifold of Nehari manifold and get three nontrivial solutions for the above problem.