<p>A set of vertices <i>S</i> is a resolving set of a graph <i>G</i>,&#xa0; if for every pair of vertices <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> in <i>G</i>, there exists a vertex <i>s</i> in <i>S</i> such that <i>x</i> and <i>y</i> differ in distance to <i>s</i>. A smallest resolving set of <i>G</i> is called a metric basis. The metric dimension <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="54" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{dim}(G)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the cardinality of a metric basis of <i>G</i>. The notion of a metric basis is applied to the problem of placing sensors in a network, where the problem of sensor faults can arise. The fault-tolerant metric dimension <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{ftdim}(G)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>ftdim</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the cardinality of a smallest resolving set <i>S</i> such that <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="58" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(S\setminus \{s\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mo lspace="0.15em" rspace="0.15em" stretchy="false">\</mo> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> remains a resolving set of <i>G</i> for every <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="44" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(s\in S\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi>S</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. A natural question is how much more sensors need to be used to achieve a fault-tolerant metric basis. It is known in literature that there exists an upper bound on <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="65" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{ftdim}(G)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>ftdim</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> which is exponential in terms of <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq6.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="59" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{dim}(G),\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> i.e. <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="268" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{ftdim}(G)\le \textrm{dim}(G)(1+2\cdot 5^{\textrm{dim}(G)-1}).\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>ftdim</mtext> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≤</mo> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mn>5</mn> <mrow> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> In this paper, we construct graphs <i>G</i> with <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="21" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="221" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{ftdim}(G)=\textrm{dim}(G)+2^{\textrm{dim}(G)-1}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>ftdim</mtext> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for any value of <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="54" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{dim}(G)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, so the exponential upper bound is necessary. We also extend these results to the <i>k</i>-metric dimension which is a generalization of the fault-tolerant metric dimension. First, we establish a similar exponential upper bound on <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="76" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{dim}_{k+1}(G)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in terms of <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq11.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="66" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{dim}_{k}(G),\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mi>k</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and then we show that there exists a graph for which <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="9_2025_2894_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="76" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{dim}_{k+1}(G)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mtext>dim</mtext> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>G</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is indeed exponential. For a possible further work, we leave the gap between the bounds to be reduced.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Fault Tolerance of Metric Basis Can Be Expensive

  • Martin Knor,
  • Jelena Sedlar,
  • Riste Škrekovski

摘要

A set of vertices S is a resolving set of a graph G,  if for every pair of vertices x and y in G, there exists a vertex s in S such that x and y differ in distance to s. A smallest resolving set of G is called a metric basis. The metric dimension \(\textrm{dim}(G)\) dim ( G ) is the cardinality of a metric basis of G. The notion of a metric basis is applied to the problem of placing sensors in a network, where the problem of sensor faults can arise. The fault-tolerant metric dimension \(\textrm{ftdim}(G)\) ftdim ( G ) is the cardinality of a smallest resolving set S such that \(S\setminus \{s\}\) S \ { s } remains a resolving set of G for every \(s\in S\) s S . A natural question is how much more sensors need to be used to achieve a fault-tolerant metric basis. It is known in literature that there exists an upper bound on \(\textrm{ftdim}(G)\) ftdim ( G ) which is exponential in terms of \(\textrm{dim}(G),\) dim ( G ) , i.e. \(\textrm{ftdim}(G)\le \textrm{dim}(G)(1+2\cdot 5^{\textrm{dim}(G)-1}).\) ftdim ( G ) dim ( G ) ( 1 + 2 · 5 dim ( G ) - 1 ) . In this paper, we construct graphs G with \(\textrm{ftdim}(G)=\textrm{dim}(G)+2^{\textrm{dim}(G)-1}\) ftdim ( G ) = dim ( G ) + 2 dim ( G ) - 1 for any value of \(\textrm{dim}(G)\) dim ( G ) , so the exponential upper bound is necessary. We also extend these results to the k-metric dimension which is a generalization of the fault-tolerant metric dimension. First, we establish a similar exponential upper bound on \(\textrm{dim}_{k+1}(G)\) dim k + 1 ( G ) in terms of \(\textrm{dim}_{k}(G),\) dim k ( G ) , and then we show that there exists a graph for which \(\textrm{dim}_{k+1}(G)\) dim k + 1 ( G ) is indeed exponential. For a possible further work, we leave the gap between the bounds to be reduced.