Scholarlink

<p>We present a new public code, FPPDF, to perform global fits of parton distribution functions (PDFs). The fitting methodology follows that implemented by the MSHT collaboration, namely applying a fixed polynomial parameterisation of the PDFs and Hessian approach to error propagation, while for data and theory settings, the libraries used by the NNPDF collaboration are taken. This therefore complements the already publicly available NNPDF fitting code to enable fits with both neural network and fixed polynomial PDF parameterisations to be performed by the community, with otherwise identical theoretical and experimental inputs. As a first application, we use the new code to compare the PDFs found from fits at both NNLO and aN<sup>3</sup>LO perturbative orders, but applying these two fitting approaches. We assess the impact of the two different methodologies on the PDFs and their uncertainties, providing results that complement previous comparisons between published PDF sets at NNLO and aN<sup>3</sup>LO. We in particular find that the relative impact of going to the higher perturbative order and/or including missing higher order uncertainties is rather insensitive to which of these PDF parameterisation methodologies are used.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Assessing the impact of fitting methodology at aN3LO with FPPDF: an open source tool for extracting Parton distribution functions in the Hessian approach

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月21日

查看全文
  • Juan M. Cruz-Martinez,
  • Tommaso Giani,
  • Lucian A. Harland-Lang

摘要

We present a new public code, FPPDF, to perform global fits of parton distribution functions (PDFs). The fitting methodology follows that implemented by the MSHT collaboration, namely applying a fixed polynomial parameterisation of the PDFs and Hessian approach to error propagation, while for data and theory settings, the libraries used by the NNPDF collaboration are taken. This therefore complements the already publicly available NNPDF fitting code to enable fits with both neural network and fixed polynomial PDF parameterisations to be performed by the community, with otherwise identical theoretical and experimental inputs. As a first application, we use the new code to compare the PDFs found from fits at both NNLO and aN3LO perturbative orders, but applying these two fitting approaches. We assess the impact of the two different methodologies on the PDFs and their uncertainties, providing results that complement previous comparisons between published PDF sets at NNLO and aN3LO. We in particular find that the relative impact of going to the higher perturbative order and/or including missing higher order uncertainties is rather insensitive to which of these PDF parameterisation methodologies are used.