<p>We compute the tensor meson pole contributions to the Hadronic Light-by-Light piece of <i>a</i><sub><i>μ</i></sub> in the purely hadronic region, using Resonance Chiral Theory. Given the differences between the dispersive and holographic groups determinations and the resulting discussion of the corresponding uncertainty estimate for the Hadronic Light-by-Light section of the muon <i>g</i> − 2 theory initiative second White Paper, we consider timely to present an alternative evaluation. In our approach, in addition to the lightest tensor meson nonet, two vector meson resonance nonets are considered, in the chiral limit. Disregarding operators with derivatives, only the form factor <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal{F}}_{1}^{T}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is non-vanishing, as assumed in the dispersive study. All parameters are determined by imposing a set of short-distance QCD constraints, and the radiative tensor decay widths. In this case, we obtain the following results for the different contributions (in units of 10<sup>−11</sup>): <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{a}}_{2}-{\text{pole}}}=-\left(1.02{\left(10\right)}_{\text{stat}}{{(}_{-0.12}^{+0.00})}_{\text{syst}}\right)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{f}}_{2}-{\text{pole}}}=-\left(3.2{\left(3\right)}_{\text{stat}}{{(}_{-0.4}^{+0.0})}_{\text{syst}}\right)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{f}}_{2}{\prime}-{\text{pole}}}=-\left(0.042{\left(13\right)}_{\text{stat}}\right)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, which add up to <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{a}}_{2}+{f}_{2}+{f}_{2}{\prime}-{\text{pole}}}=-\left({4.3}_{-0.5}^{+0.3}\right)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, in close agreement with the holographic result when truncated to <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal{F}}_{1}^{T}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> only. However, with an ad-hoc extended Lagrangian, that also generates <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal{F}}_{3}^{T}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, as in the holographic approach, we have found: <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{a}}_{2}-{\text{pole}}}=+0.47{\left(1.43\right)}_{\text{norm}}{\left(3\right)}_{\text{stat}}{{(}_{-0.00}^{+0.06})}_{\text{syst}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{f}}_{2}-{\text{pole}}}=+1.18{\left(4.18\right)}_{\text{norm}}{\left(12\right)}_{\text{stat}}{{(}_{-0.00}^{+0.24})}_{\text{syst}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{f}}_{2}{\prime}-{\text{pole}}}=+0.040{\left(78\right)}_{\text{norm}}{\left(2\right)}_{\text{stat}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, summing to <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({a}_{\mu }^{{{a}_{2}+{f}_{2}+f}_{2}{\prime}-{\text{pole}}}=+1.7(4.4)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, which agree with these recent determinations within uncertainties (dominated by the <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal{F}}_{3}^{T}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> normalization). We point out that <i>RχT</i> generates all five form factors, differently to previous approaches. The contributions to <i>a</i><sub><i>μ</i></sub> of <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\mathcal{F}}_{\text{2,4},5}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> cannot be evaluated in the current basis, preventing for the moment a complete calculation of <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({a}_{\mu }^{\text{T}-{\text{pole}}{\text{s}}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> within our framework.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Tensor meson pole contributions to the HLbL piece of \({a}_{\mu }^{\text{HLbL}}\) within RχT

  • Emilio J. Estrada,
  • Pablo Roig

摘要

We compute the tensor meson pole contributions to the Hadronic Light-by-Light piece of aμ in the purely hadronic region, using Resonance Chiral Theory. Given the differences between the dispersive and holographic groups determinations and the resulting discussion of the corresponding uncertainty estimate for the Hadronic Light-by-Light section of the muon g − 2 theory initiative second White Paper, we consider timely to present an alternative evaluation. In our approach, in addition to the lightest tensor meson nonet, two vector meson resonance nonets are considered, in the chiral limit. Disregarding operators with derivatives, only the form factor \({\mathcal{F}}_{1}^{T}\) is non-vanishing, as assumed in the dispersive study. All parameters are determined by imposing a set of short-distance QCD constraints, and the radiative tensor decay widths. In this case, we obtain the following results for the different contributions (in units of 10−11): \({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{a}}_{2}-{\text{pole}}}=-\left(1.02{\left(10\right)}_{\text{stat}}{{(}_{-0.12}^{+0.00})}_{\text{syst}}\right)\) , \({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{f}}_{2}-{\text{pole}}}=-\left(3.2{\left(3\right)}_{\text{stat}}{{(}_{-0.4}^{+0.0})}_{\text{syst}}\right)\) and \({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{f}}_{2}{\prime}-{\text{pole}}}=-\left(0.042{\left(13\right)}_{\text{stat}}\right)\) , which add up to \({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{a}}_{2}+{f}_{2}+{f}_{2}{\prime}-{\text{pole}}}=-\left({4.3}_{-0.5}^{+0.3}\right)\) , in close agreement with the holographic result when truncated to \({\mathcal{F}}_{1}^{T}\) only. However, with an ad-hoc extended Lagrangian, that also generates \({\mathcal{F}}_{3}^{T}\) , as in the holographic approach, we have found: \({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{a}}_{2}-{\text{pole}}}=+0.47{\left(1.43\right)}_{\text{norm}}{\left(3\right)}_{\text{stat}}{{(}_{-0.00}^{+0.06})}_{\text{syst}}\) , \({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{f}}_{2}-{\text{pole}}}=+1.18{\left(4.18\right)}_{\text{norm}}{\left(12\right)}_{\text{stat}}{{(}_{-0.00}^{+0.24})}_{\text{syst}}\) and \({a}_{\mu }^{{\text{f}}_{2}{\prime}-{\text{pole}}}=+0.040{\left(78\right)}_{\text{norm}}{\left(2\right)}_{\text{stat}}\) , summing to \({a}_{\mu }^{{{a}_{2}+{f}_{2}+f}_{2}{\prime}-{\text{pole}}}=+1.7(4.4)\) , which agree with these recent determinations within uncertainties (dominated by the \({\mathcal{F}}_{3}^{T}\) normalization). We point out that RχT generates all five form factors, differently to previous approaches. The contributions to aμ of \({\mathcal{F}}_{\text{2,4},5}\) cannot be evaluated in the current basis, preventing for the moment a complete calculation of \({a}_{\mu }^{\text{T}-{\text{pole}}{\text{s}}}\) within our framework.